keeping this information this long. we are talking about it was 1810 days and now to go to five years are you concerned? guest: the question is how does this affect the counterterrorism effort. in law enforment if you keep information on someone for five years the information could be stale or wrong. and in addition what part of the investigation, do you get an enhanced look at five years? what is causing concern is the information collection on people who have in ties to terrorism. that is the type of thing we have to look at. this is part a national debate. and who are you looking at? and what is the range in which government can take a look at innocent people who have no connections going forward. dave: and the viewers at home wondering if they are keepingness on me for five years with no known ties to terror are
extremists and a governor. in our fourth story somebody has to defend it with fact and against testimony from some of the state s own law enforcers. the justice department filed a lawsuit to stop arizona s law claim ing it s unconstitutional. today the justice department said arizona a sb-1070 usurps federal authority. because it requires local law enforment to enforce immigration laws which are national things. the lawsuit seeks a preliminary injunction to stop the law from taking effect on the 29th of this month. today s filing also included declarations from arizona law enforcement saying sb-1070 will hamper the ability to police local communities. the attorney general eric holder in a statement acknowledged the problem facing arizona, but adding seeking to address the issue through a patchwork of state laws will only create more problems than it solves. gop denunciations are swift, universal and cliched. from arizona s governor. jan broouer