He helped draw up and carry out the cias enhanced Interrogation Programme after the September 11 Attacks. He personally interrogated suspects using techniques like waterboarding. His critics say that he is a torturer. He says he has nothing to apologise for, and what he did was harsh, but legal, and necessary. So this is your study . Yes. The thing that is useful about a library like this is, like, for example, this is reliance of the traveller, its a book of sharia law from a salafist position. Ive got a couple of versions of the quran, because the translations are not always the same. What sort of insights, based on their knowledge from these books, as well as your training as a psychologist, about what motivates the kind of people you have interrogated into carrying out the deeds or wanting to carry out the deeds that we know about . Ive heard people say that these Terror Attacks that were seeing in europe, great britain, and the United States had nothing to do with islam. But havin
and qanon, it couldn t have a bigger backer in america. frank? we can t hear you. unmute yourself and start over. we will let frank work out his audio issues. have you lost me? there you go. start over. i can hear you. but you can t hear me. start over. you have all the time in the world. we got you. all right. look, i think these two stories are related. the german raid and trump getting more extreme in who he is meeting with and aligning with. the germans do what they do very well in part because they isolate and identify the extremist threats, particularly violent threats. that s what they hang their hat on. that enables all kinds of law enforcement techniques. the more that trump goes extreme, the more he says, this is who i am, i m meeting with
start on your show since the search that there s no way that a federal judge is going to order an affidavit justifying the search to be released. it s an ongoing investigation. there are witnesses involved. all sorts of law enforcement techniques. now, last week this judge, you know, said, look, justice department, if i had to release something, tell us what i can release. tell me what could be redacted and what could be unredacted, and some of the news outlets reported that to mean, the judge is ordering the affidavit released. of course not. what the judge did today was say, hey, that is not what i said. i said, if there is something that can be released, i want to hear about the justice department s view on that. but it may be at the end of the day, nothing basically can be released, and i m going to get something that s essentially all blacked out, and he s alerting the public to that fact. and the justice department and judge s view appears to be protection of the witnesses is the
fiance. i ve been talking about law enforcement efforts about how is it possible there has been no trace for so long. a former fbi agent told me that there are only a few scenarios here where someone could really evade law enforcement for this amount of time. one, it s a person who is very prepared in law enforcement techniques, knows ins and outs of how a search like this would go and is able to hide, someone who perhaps has had experience with law enforcement before. it could also be a person who is getting help from somebody else. and the last option she presented to me is this could be someone who is deceased and has not yet been found and she said, look, it s very likely that brian laundrie didn t know the ins and outs of investigative techniques. so the two options she was looking at were that he was