and last few minutes of white house press secretary has been asked of president biden knew about the fps plan to carry out a raid on former president trump s home in florida. this is how he responded to the question from a journalist at the briefing. question from a “ournalist at the briefini. :, , , :, , :, briefing. no. the president was not a- iroved, briefing. no. the president was not approved. was briefing. no. the president was not approved, was not briefing. no. the president was not approved, was not aware briefing. no. the president was not approved, was not aware of - briefing. no. the president was not approved, was not aware of it, - briefing. no. the president was not approved, was not aware of it, no, | approved, was not aware of it, no, no one at the white house was given a heads up. ida. no one at the white house was given a heads up no one at the white house was given a heads up. no, that did not happen. is a white house a heads up. no, that did not happen.
former president in florida, was the president or anyone at the white house aware of that search warrant or has anyone at the white house or the president been briefed in the aftermath of that search warrant? no, the president was not aware of it. no one at the white house was given a heads-up. no, that did not happen. is the white house concerned given the domestic findings, the message this sends to the rest of the world that the department of justice carried out this operation on a former president and could create the appearance of political motivated prosecution? you ve heard us say many times at the podium and the president say this, the justice department conducts investigations independently. we leave any law enforcement matters to them. it would not be appropriate for us to comment on any ongoing investigations. i can say that president biden has been unequivocal since the campaign.
patel of ust that. yasmin. which side patel ofjust that. yasmin. which side would patel ofjust that. yasmin. which side would i patel ofjust that. yasmin. which side would i choose patel ofjust that. yasmin. which side would i choose in patel ofjust that. yasmin. which side would i choose in this - patel ofjust that. yasmin. which l side would i choose in this battle? there s been so much evidence of really big failures by various police forces and protecting women, often in a lot of areas, losing public trust. there has to be some change. do i think priti patel is the person to make that change? frankly, no. iwatch the person to make that change? frankly, no. i watch the battle with interest. ,, , ., , . interest. she is the home office secretary at interest. she is the home office secretary at the interest. she is the home office secretary at the moment. - interest. she is the home office secretary at the moment. she . interest. she is the home office i secretary at the
and i think she s right, is that republicans think the democrats simply want this committee, which is redundant in their eyes, as a political issue, to keep it front and center because they d rather talk about that and have trump at the center of the election than other issues. so i do think that s the political tactic that s being used. but as it relates to this law enforcement matters, i m very sympathetic to officer fanone. i m very sympathetic to every single officer who was on duty that day because of the way they were treated by people who supported our president that always espoused back the blue. and it s contradictory, and there s no great answer for your question. i am glad, by the way, that the justice department, despite all the political wrangling, is moving at light speed to arrest and bring to justice all these people who were involved at the capitol, and i think some republicans would say these political committees are less important than bringing people to justice who
general assembly legislatures meet different types of year and longer than 40 days and that s why ours looked like it came right after the election. the fact ha it did we had the senate runoff elections that finished on january 6th. january 5th. all right. do you think the fulton county investigation into the former president s role in perhaps attempting to manipulate the voting results in georgia is a legitimate investigation? it s a law enforcement matter and i don t comment on ongoing law enforcement matters. are you have you cooperating with that investigation given the role, your role in it if you will? i always cooperate with the law. my job is i m a constitutional officer. we follow law, follow the process, follow the protocols so we support and we will, you know, help any law enforcement agency that needs information.