don t have mechanisms for catching or trapping something like that because it doesn t happen. at the same time usually there s one mechanism that will catch something. there s the media, the rival opponents, the national republicans and local republicans, i don t think that s getting talked enough about, and that s republicans who saw the guy run two years ago, what were they aware of, willing to tolerate in the hopes to see how far it would go in this climate, the other thing we ve never seen is silence like this from leadership. as you see kevin mccarthy in his battle to stay alive and become the next speaker he has been incredibly quiet in part because he needs every vote. no reason to believe that santos is not going to get seated, i believe he will get seated and the investigations continue. he has to. there s no mechanism in the house for getting rid of him. that s something people haven t understood. and there could be a law enforcement effort to get rid of
i m sorry, anderson, it may or may not hold up in court. to me, it raises a different question, our banking systems in our insurance companies are clearly operating way outside of the legal structures, and they after all hold money essentially interest for depositors and premium players, so we re not enforcing the law regarding this. so the whole scope of big banking in america especially international level big banking, is just ridden with criminal behavior, and we just have a tiny law enforcement effort, and we don t really try to go after it. how does the burden of proof in a civil case like, this differ from a burden of proof in a criminal case. it s much lower, evan anderson, is by preponderance of credible evidence, which means that one side is just a little bit more evidence than the, other supposed to be on a reasonable doubt, which is what we have on somebody faces jail time. i think in this case, though, you ll have a very lengthy litigation, and the defense attorneys a
look, new york real estate there s a history here of inflating values and being fast and loose. is that an argument that would hold up in court this was how business was done in the go-go 80s and i guess enow. you re asking me? yeah. i m sorry. anderson, it may not hold up in court. to me it answers a different question. our banking systems are clearly operating outside the legal strictures. they hold money in trust for depositors and premium payers. and we re not enforcing the law regarding this. and so the whole scope of big banking in america especially international level big banking is just riven with criminal behavior, and we just have a tiny law enforcement effort we don t really try to go after it. well, how does the burden of
intelligence, prevent all forms of violence and to support law enforcement enforcement effort to keep our communities safe. americans are spending $5,000 on gasoline, almost double a year ago. where are people supposed to go to get all that extra cash? extra cash to pay for gas? yeah. one of the things we have been very clear about to do everything in our power to make sure that we lower costs. you know, it is important, we see it. the president understands what the american people are going through. and that s why we are doing everything that we can, we have made multiple announcements in the past several months of what we are doing, whether it s the strategic petroleum reserve, the ethanol 15, to make sure that the american people are not feeling putin s price hike. this is where this is coming from, 60 to 70% of the current
house a freedom caucus with knowledge of the president s planning for that day sent a message f to the white house chf ofhe staff with this explicit warning if potus allows this to occur, we re driving a stake in the heart of the federal republic. did you discuss that or similar concerns with the white house chief of staff or with the vice president or his staff? the committee after all of that goes on toth assert that trump actually did intend, he did want to go down to the capitol himself afterdo he made his speh riling up the crowd. hee apparently wanted to lead e mob down to the u.s. capitol personally. they said they want to ask ivanka about that.t the committee also asserts they have foundit no evidence that trump ever called for the national guard to be deployed or for any other law enforcement