question this is a legitimate attempt by a state legislature to discover the boundaries of roe vs. wade. this measure is one of many attempts by north dakota s republican-ruled legislature to discover the boundaries of roe vs. wade. the state passed a measure that defines life beginning at concept. it would question the legality of birth control and in vitro fertilization. it may seem like north dakota s lawmakers want to clamp down on abortion clinics, but the number of abortion clinics is exactly one. for a legislature intent on protecting life, no matter what settled law dictates, it s regulations are inconsistent at best. for example, in north dakota, drivers are not required to wear a seatbelt. and while all eyes may be focused on the state, what happens in north dakota does not stay in north dakota.
building a bigger business. martha: yeah, you know, howard schultz, the ceo of starbucks whom we talked about, he is supportive of health care reform. but he says that the mandate is just going to be too much for small businesses. you know, explain to us why that is. and also, the mandate is really the central issue in all of these cases that may go to the supreme court. maybe he s pushing for change on that front. well, if you roll the clock back, martha, you ll remember that basically everyone agreed that it was important for health care for health care reform because the costs were growing so rapidly so i don t think it s a surprising thing that they were favor of reform, the details, it provides employees are a set of coverages that the law dictates. it s not that they get to dictate whatever they can afford. there are rules about what they can offer, it s expensive and if you re a small business and you have to pick between hiring a new worker and providing much more expensive
protect those explicit constitutional rights. the right of free speech. the right of free press. the right not to have your property taken except for public use. why is the biggest question mark you get from groups left of center are nervous she could be a surprise. i m not sure there s a great deal of concern here but let me point out i think senator feingold s point is a good one. we want a justice and supreme court that will protect the individual against abuses of government. government power can become very abusive. senator feingold was raising that point in his question. it s not always the populist position. we want the supreme court is not meant to be a populist body but meant to do what the law dictates without regard to politics or without regard to popularity. as you go you re the ranking republican on judiciary and also on the armed services committee. tomorrow you ll have elena kagan before the judiciary committee and general petraeus before armed services. are you g