ntsb did spend 7 minutes covering the story as they should have. this is all shameful and proves just how abusively biased, hypocritical the media in this country is. the media research center, they search their archives and they found these examples of the liberal press attacking paula jones. remember, she won her lawsuit against bill clinto clinton. take a look. if the case is fomented by right wing nuts and yes she is not a very credible witness and it s really not a law case at all. i think she is a dubious witness. i really do. we have an awful lot to talk about this week including the sexual harassment suit against the president. tough to figure out who is being harassed. is she not trying to capitalize on this? effect to profit from impugning the president? i have to profess complete confusion over this entire case why this is even a case. sean: the media covering for bill clinton gets even worse in january of 19199, lisa myers taped the first
related to the president s stand during the campaign or frequent criticism of cnn. we are back with dan henninger, allysia finally and james freeman. james, what do you make to have law case, antitrust case? it s stunning and we have been enjoying the new era of the government pulling back from its arbitrary and ta capricious constant and you look at the turner capable channels and hbo, i don t know how you see dominance here. mr. trump was calling cnn fake news and now we say it s a bundle of channels we can t live with out or something?
related to the president s stand during the campaign or frequent criticism of cnn. we are back with dan henninger, allysia finally and james freeman. james, what do you make to have law case, antitrust case? it s stunning and we have been enjoying the new era of the government pulling back from its arbitrary and ta capricious constant and you look at the turner capable channels and hbo, i don t know how you see dominance here. mr. trump was calling cnn fake news and now we say it s a bundle of channels we can t live with out or something?
honing in with him? we want to hone in clearly on the aspects of this travel ban in terms of how it can be used to roh file people. there are six of us meeting. our organizations have been on record dealing with racial profiling. this is profiling an area of real concern. we want it deal with the voting rights act. we had the celebration of the 52nd anniversary of going across the edmund pettes bridge that led to the voting rights act in 1956 with the support of the new attorney general when he was in the senate and now said that he will not continue as the department of justice has been doing to support our fight in the texas voter i.d. law case. naacp legal dchbs fund is directly involved in that.
it could be devastating. but that is the way the law is written. it come cans down to numbers, quite honestly. that is not the law case. but it is interesting to work with the dc circuit does. and if it goes in the supreme court, they have justices ka ga n and schedulia. and they say uh-huh. and it is interesting. how would you go back. if you had two decisions and we are finding two decisions that say that and then go back to the court court and change that based on politics, that would be a hard one to get around. it is not the point and not a supreme court case just yet. it goes to the court court, and it is going to be close on many levels it is important than the previous case on obama care.