when our drone team started showing what was going on on the ground over the rio grande and saw there on the bridge, then everyone paid attention. the bridge emptied they go back. do you know what s so disturbing about this? it s not that they have bad policies. it s an intentional no policy which really frustrates the border states and just about every state. many of which were invited down to texas to meet with the governor of texas, 25 a.g.s showed up. and for about an hour they told their stories and tried to come up with a battle plan because they have been abandoned by the federal government. steve: here s what the governor of texas had to say about what s going on. the lawlessness on our southern border. it is astonishing that one law breaker, that we are having to wage legal action against, is the president of the united states. there are laws passed by the united states congress that the president is not enforcing.
one of the other huge events, it s been such a crazy time since you ve been in the job, of course, is what has gone on over the partygate saga, as it s come to be known. but the last time we talked, you said you didn t know what had gone on in downing street, in terms of clarity and transparency, if you get a fine, we know that you got a questionnaire, but if you get a lockdown fine, will you make that public? yes. you will. if borisjohnson gets a fine, can he stay on as prime minister or should he resign? well, look, he s already been asked this, i think he was asked it literally an hour ago, or two hours ago. i m asking you. it s not for me to answer on his behalf. and i think the prime minister said. what is your view, you re probably the second most senior person in the government, can a lawmaker be a law breaker, is that 0k? look, it would be wrong for me to say anything more than what the prime minister has said, laura, and he said, look, we don t, he doesn t, we don t know the a
we re not going to play that tonight in this particular report because of how graphic it is. you can hear witnesses there saying what the individual did. he just killed two people. he wasn t even apprehended that night the way police treated him. that came much later. the defense is arguing that the minor on the screen that broke the law to get the gun you see was trying to serve the community, trying to help law enforcement. you see him there with his hands up. i want to break that down because it is a very illogical reach. that individual was a law breaker. he broke the law to get the gun he used to kill two people. he also didn t live in that community. so what s on the line of the trial is whether that defense gets you anywhere. can you illegally get a gun, go somewhere elsewhere people that support blm are gathered, kill two of them, then say you were
who s down that you wind up losing the morality of it and the right and wrong of it, and that, i think, is super important. the other thing is to not allow these things to be disconnected. the rules that affect how people vote are the same rules that will allow republicans to subvert elections. the same rules that is going to make the mother of three children waiting in line for three hours not be able to stand in line because she doesn t have any water, is the same rule that is going to allow republicans to say that that mother of three is a law-breaker and should be criminally prosecuted. so, we need to make sure that we are looking at these things from january 6th to voter suppression to a tax on election subversion, that these are all of a piece. they re all the centerpiece of the republican party agenda. without federal voting rights legislation, what can you accomplish ahead of the 2022 or 2024 elections in court? look, what my job is, is to
steve: suddenly poo tuts can stand for plumber of the united states of america. hey, scott, let me ask you this though. what did you makes a a guy who has drawn a million cartoons in his life in the visual display. what did you think of that time magazine display with the images of donald trump over his head apparently on the verge of drowning in deep? in terms of imagery, it s really great. you notice we are in this two completely different realities now. in one reality the president keeps violating all these things which are not actual laws. so, for example, there was owe a collusion that isn t illegal. the obstruction that didn t happen. the meeting at the tower that wasn t illegal. and now the payments to stormy that are totally legal. so part of the country believes that he is a serial law breaker. the other side sees absolutely nothing happening. and i usually apply what i call the big foot test to those two realities. which is two hunters go into the forest and they come back