Queensland Chief Justice Helen Bowskill has put men in their place and struck a blow against the patriarchy by reversing the traditional Mr/Ms order on court forms to instead say Ms/Ms .
He said the list of voters didn t distinguish between permanent and temporary change of address, which is a division that can be found from the National Change of Law Address Registry.
Additionally, tinkering with the list cannot be done this soon before the Jan. 5, 2021, Senate runoff elections, he said, referring to conditions in the National Voter Registration Act.
In an emailed statement, Shepherd told
The Epoch Times that the county board utterly failed in its duty to keep elections in Cobb secure by refusing to investigate whether any of the over 16,000 voters who have filled out and submitted a change of address form with the US Postal Service showing they have changed their residence to a new one outside the State of Georgia have, in fact, moved outside the state and are ineligible to vote in Georgia under Georgia law.
Georgia County Elections Board Dismisses Challenges to Voter Roll
Challenges to more than 16,000 people on the voter registration list in a Georgia county have been dismissed by an elections board.
The Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration voted on Dec. 18 to dismiss three complaints that sought to remove voters from the compilation.
Jason Shepherd, the chairman of the Republican Party in the county, told the board that he found evidence of approximately 16,024 people registered to vote in the county who reside outside of Georgia.
The information was gathered by running the county’s voter registration database against the National Change of Address registry, he told the board in a letter earlier this month.
though there s no fraud. change the law to make it tighter. another thing curious to me, representative. the three cases, none of them had anything to do with voter fraud at the polls in terms of i.d. one was a guy that was convicted of buying votes. another was an absentee ballot fraud and the last was an absentee ballot fraud. none of it had anything to do with somebody going to the polls trying to be somebody else. so where does your law address even these cases. let me tell you what arturo davis said again. he said voting the names of dead and the nonexistence and the too mentally impaired to function canceled out the votes of citizens who are exercising their rights. that s right. that s suppression by any light. if you doubt it exists, i don t, he says. i ve heard the peddlers of these ballots brag about it. i ve been asked to provide the funds for it, and i am confident it has changed at least a few close local elections. well, let me tell you
state in the nation trying to deal with the problem of illegal immigration. so i totally support it. i think the confusion developed as a result of an interview i did where i said what i just said and then the reporter said to me, what about the racial profiling or pulling people over for because they simply look a different way, because they are brown. i said i would never support a law like that. i wouldn t. that would be a terrible thing. who would support a law like that. but that s not the arizona law. unfortunately they just took out the part i described, left out the part that s not the arizona law, put it on a blog, huffington post picked it up, next thing you know, tim things the law has gone too far. absolutely untrue. people aware of the law, i believe around 60% support this in that state. does that law address what you