Guy and the entire biden family operatioamion but n, but especiy joe biden, because today he announced the appointmentanns a Special Counsel to investigate possible hunterme crimes. But of course, he made no pre mention of president joe biden. Instead of appointing someone from outside of the government to lead this investigation, as by law, by the way,on is recommended under regulationn 28 c. F. R. 601. 3. Thanks to gregg jarrett, merriccsr k waved his magic wank and he just promotede david weiss. That is the same federal prosecutorsa , th, The One Who N been slow walking the criminal probe into Huntenter Bidr Bidenr several years. Hes the guy that allowed the statute of limitations to expire on multiple major felonies before majoe, of cours, then trying to put together that sweetheart, you kno w, little deal with hunter, no Jail Timane Ite and tie it up w, Neat Little Bow and, you know, h wover it all up. A Sweetheart Deal that Noejecte One Else will get. That, of course, rejected by
Its important to us we month to month met with the dr requesters the oswalds ones on the roof to see the view issue theyre mostly concerned with and its been from the beginning its about the deck of theirs on the roof and the view from it were also met with other neighbors multiple times over the last and a half were excited been the overwhelming support of the community and the north Beach Organization nullify the president had to leave because the time but the association is also in support and other friends and neighbors here people of the community can you please stand we would like to thank you for coming out tonight maybe those who are not part of us could please sit arrest based on the concerns weve made significant changes before submitting weve worked with the Planning Department its a straightforward project that compliepz with the residential guidelines and after several designs it was supported that i the design team our plan stance on its oppose merits this is a picture of
We month to month met with the dr requesters the oswalds ones on the roof to see the view issue theyre mostly concerned with and its been from the beginning its about the deck of theirs on the roof and the view from it were also met with other neighbors multiple times over the last and a half were excited been the overwhelming support of the community and the north Beach Organization nullify the president had to leave because the time but the association is also in support and other friends and neighbors here people of the community can you please stand we would like to thank you for coming out tonight maybe those who are not part of us could please sit arrest based on the concerns weve made significant changes before submitting weve worked with the Planning Department its a straightforward project that compliepz with the residential guidelines and after several designs it was supported that i the design team our plan stance on its oppose merits this is a picture of the block face with
Appellate annual s block in the right of it and has four stories and were filling in the gap and. Consistent with the planning code and design guidelines. This sketch here briefly this shows where we started the project with a three story front and here we took away the three story front and setback the top two stories to in consideration of views of our neighbor to the west who is completely in support of this project. Here you can see from the rear of the project this is where we started. We since removed the roof top penthouse with elevator and the pits in order to preserve the views of the roof top for the neighbor. It was important to retain accessibility to the area and my parents are elderly and one is wheelchair bound and this was a concession in the attempts that we gave concession to the neighbor by removing the top portions of the building and the front of the building. Weve done this our building actually is not as tall as the neighbors building nor as large. I will simply
But its certainly not this building at all. It talks about this building being out of context with the neighborhood buildings and its not true at all. Its very much in context with it. I guess without repeating what ms. Tam said its basically not a historic resource. It lost all of its inintegritiy and nothing significant happened here and thats why its not part of the Historic District but in term was an electic districts and Tall Buildings and newer buildings and it fits into a eclectic mix so i want to encourage you to support the categorical exemption determined by the Planning Department, and not accept this appeal and i will leave the last two minutes unplanned to bruno. Well, i guess theres not much more to say. Arnie has been very good to detail in the report that was given to you our rebuttal very carefully how this project is not a there is any reason to appeal this categorical exemption. All of the materials of the building have been changed over the years. The building has