reporter: it was the cruise of a lifetime. a family spending new years rounding the volcanic wide island off new zealand s coast. january 1, 2010. this girl, then 15, decided to spend the morning alone in her cabin. and the trip of a lifetime turned to terror as her locked door to cabin 3073 suddenly clicked. i didn t hear the card key go in but i did hear like the door open and like the lock like and i thought it was my brother or sister at first. and then when i saw the guy come in, i didn t recognize the bartender uniform. it was someone working on the ship so i thought it was a room attendant that was going to clean my room because i didn t put the sign like, oh, don t disturb or whatever. reporter: it wasn t a attendant. it was a crew member. threatening the girl not to say a word as he forced the teen to perform oral sex. at her family s request, we are not showing her face. you were 15. yeah. reporter: scared. you didn t tell you family. no. i at the time
of a lifetime. a family spending new years rounding the volcanic wide island off new zealand s coast. january 1, 2010. this girl, then 15, decided to spend the morning alone in her cabin. and the trip of a lifetime turned to terror as her locked door to cabin 3073 suddenly clicked. i didn t hear the card key go in but i did hear like the door open and like the lock like and i thought it was my brother or sister at first. and then when i saw the guy come in, i didn t recognize the bartender uniform. it was someone working on the ship so i thought it was a room attendant that was going to clean my room because i didn t put the sign like, oh, don t disturb or whatever. reporter: it wasn t a room attendant, was a cruise member dressed in a bartender s uniform. threatening the girl not to say a word she says, as he fossed the teen to perform oral sex. at her family s request, we are not showing her face. you were 15. yeah. reporter: scared. you didn t tell you family.
did i state it correctly? your recommendations in support for the idea of moving ahead with identifying consolidation sites does not decide the question of yucca mountain one way or the other. whether we re for yucca mountain im accurate to say whether we re for it or against it, we still need to move ahead with consolidation sites and we still need to move ahead as soon as the legislation is passed to begin to identify a second repository? absolutely. clearly, the question of what needs to be done with yucca mountain is quite controversial. i think if our commission had been required to answer that question, we would have had a difficult time reaching a consensus. but what we found is that the things that we recommended that we do move forward on, developing new repository, developing consolidated storage, creating a new entity, these are things we need to do as the commission said regardless of whether we were to retain, discard, place into deep freeze or whatever end
enable us to be a whole lot smarter. or as my father used to say, just take just take your smart pills, tom. just take your smart pills. we re going to take the smart pills and you give us a full prescription of those. laura haynes who sits behind me gave me a note. i just want to refer to it briefly here nepquestion goes back to jurisdictions. i show this to senator barrasso. it s very short so i just want to mention this before you all are excused. i believe that some folks are confused about the subcommittee s jurisdiction. and we want to be clear and state very briefly what we think it is. this is a quote. nonmilitary environmental regulation and control of nuclear energy. it s nonmilitary environmental regulation and control of nuclear energy. that s verbatim. our friends in the energy committee, whom we love, have jurisdiction over the, and this is verbatim, quote, nonmilitary development of nuclear energy. that s the nonmilitary development of nuclear energy. and sin