jerry nadler, the judiciary chairman told me earlier this hour, no way are they going to give up. lots of other committees feel the same. but is there a public relations kind of how much the voters can stomach it risk there? or should they just keep going because that s their duty? i think the challenge they re all digging out of, and i remember talking to staffers who are working for the senate and house intelligence committees at the time who were worried this bar that collusion is the only way that we should move forward was a dangerous bar two years ago or a year and a half ago. but they don t control the entire democratic party narrative. they re digging out of that right now. this was always going to be a case where mueller s report was going to be a starting point to look into, to launch hearings. that s how it s always worked and how it was always going to work. and so it s a more of an educating the public on the process and i think that s what something that the democrats
investigation, the investigation of him. so that s unlike any private citizen and the idea that he then goes and denigrates law enforcement, boy, that is just a horrible thing. give us a sense of the next year. we know that the congress is in doubt. the house could guess democrat this november which means the democrats on the hill would have the power of subpoena, they would have the power to launch hearings and markup and actually vote on articles of impeachment. all that will happen if they get the majority on the house side come this november. then the question is what will likely be the procedure. what do you expect bob mueller to do if he has a case? what will he do with his case, obstruction, money laundering or collusion or all three. mueller is the consummate professional. he s operated quietly building the case, looking as the all the evidence trying to figure it out. they have a couple options available to him. he can try and seek an indictment of the president which woul