nasty things about him. i see him as a guy that is just trying to uphold the law. it seems like she not as it was right around easter. i think she sore about the investigation. i m not the person they re making these accusations about. if they were making accusations about me and i knew i didn t do anything wrong, i would probably be emotionally charged about that. i understand why the president is emotionally charged about it, but if you re asking me to evaluate somebody, i have a reasonably good prtrack record, have known rod for 33 years, that s me and my personal view of him. but as it relactes to jeff
council since my time in washington. his departure from the white house, when ever thever that mal be a loss. to donald trump, i hope it s not true. he is leaving at white house council? you can t let that happen. i think in senator grassley s case it has to do with the nomination of the judges. he is unbelievable scout in terms of picking judges. they transformed the judicial system for the next generation and possibly more. specifically to the white house, i think the alarm bells go off when somebody leaves and the president is drugging along. he has a great situation now with snaf ta. in terms of judging a president,
sessions as it relates to jeff saessions, i don t like tht they have been feuding, they got along great in the beginning. if you were talking to the president, he would say the reason they were feuding is they did not want jeff to recuse himself from the russian investigation, they wanted him in there, he felt he would be somebody that would look at the thing fairly as opposed to friends of james comey. he has been very clear that he is very miffed about the recusal. i want to move on to something you tweeted about john mccain. you tweeted this our flag is at half-staff honoring a veteran like senator john mccain should be above politicking and personal grievance. were you disappointed with the delay in the president lauding
if it is important to them, they could have asked them about it. remember when michael cohen plead guilty, he said i committed these illegal acts at the direction of donald trump. as i m thinking this through, he was directed to do this by a candidate of office, directed to do this by trump. if there was a bigger operation, maybe there was more evidence of the president, i don t know, but there could have been more of the president in the ambitioner operation. we have the tape of him on the list.
celebrities. and this story suggests that the inquirer knew a lot about his personal life, and trump himself was very concerned about keeping private. and donald trump and michael cohen for the purposes of the campaign wanted to buy it. you re a better lawyer than i am, but it doesn t seem to change the legal implications of what the president or michael cohen did already. whatever scheme existed between them is just more, not different. and the legal issue in connection with the karen mcdoogle story is whether or not michael cohen laundered a campaign contribution through