to be a fifteen. ready?15 ay, one , two . three , much better. okay, you got a nine and a half. excellent. excellent. candidate. by the way. i m in your favorite city and all these people have said hi to you everywhere. i go, it s like say hi to chance at ashan. i m in san francisco. you have s sean. o many fans here, her by the way. so it e,s s great.grea it s great to be here amongllin your fan base. i all hav right. they re telling me i haveof to go. i m doing it there, bu t avo i pleaseid bring a lot of surro security and i would avoidun the area surrounding the one mult radius between nancy pelosi s multimillion dollari home and office. g we re hitting the road tomorrow here. sean, thanks. laura so great show. all right. i m laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle f from san francisco tonight. thanks foror b being with us. s, not blameless. that s the focus of tonight s angle. now, the trail of death along the border is something that s become so commonplace
dollars worth of the same drugae was intercepted after being shippe farizond to package froma to a local restaurant. and where i am here in san francisco, the fentanyl problem is so bad, they re calling in the california national guar wd we need to do everything we can to provide all of the resources so that we have p the capacity to handle a problem of this magnitude. lau yeah,ra democrats like mayor london bried aren t pointingtint the finger at thoshee to blame n national leadership. of course not. ditto with chicago sditto wicag lightfoot. now, a few days ago, she had the nerve to try to blame the huge number of migrantse n flowing into the windy citthy on the state of texas, as in gov. greg abbott. nonow, in this brazen letter, s wrote , your lack of consideration or coordinatiod an in any attempt to cause chaos and score political points has resulted in a critical tipping n point. we simply have no moreo more sho spaces or resources to accommodate an increase of
event or couldn t write merry christmas to the soldiers. when the school officials filed this appeal and said, look, we re immune from this suit because in our view, these kids are too young to have first amendment rights, we were blown away. we thought that is an outrageous argument and we won the original decision 3-0 at the federal court of appeals but there s a special procedure they invoked where all 17 said, you know what? we re not so sure. they dissolved the opinion and they re setting today to rehear that. usually that means there s a number of judges actually considering doing this. so this could affect every kid in the country and i think it s affecting the people without kids auto. au yeah and you re detailing the winding road that this case is taking. a lot of legal mind will be looking at this decision today and some big legal minds weighing in on your side. we have attorney ken starr representing and the former solicitor general under the bush administration. what does