i think we had someone from the court s office saying i believe they represented themselves as someone they weren t and you have latham saying on a second bibles that i did not do this and the judge will have to ask decide. unless i have pretty clear evidence that sanctions are appropriate, this may end up being a controversy and i would not be surprised if the judge says this is very serious but i cannot find that anyone did anything intentionally. that is my prediction and i am often running. danny ceballos walking us through step-by-step. great job, as always. the grand jury convened into the january 6 insurrection and donald trump s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results are scheduled to reconvene tomorrow. that is likely the earliest. meanwhile, we are getting new details about one potential key witness who spoke to special counsel jack smith s team. the former director of the cyber security agency confirmed to nbc news that he was interviewed by investigators who chara
does the judge believed? if the judge believes someone from latham called up and they were, that will be a big problem for latham. you would be shocked if a firm like that impersonates because of the potential consequences of the case? i love a good controversy but when you think about it, this is what i focus on. if i am a partner of high- ranking lawyer latham and even if i was going to do that and i am not saying any of them would but if i was going to call up a quart and pretend to be someone else, i don t think i would find that out to a veteran staff member because is going to create a paper trail. it seems to me that this may have been just a misunderstanding. what a juicy controversy it would be if someone called up and pretended to be someone that they weren t but i don t know if we will ever get to the bottom of this. sometimes you are never going to find out the truth.
Were you Seen at the fifth annual Legacy Circle Luncheon, presented by St. Peter’s Health Partners Center for Philanthropy, in Latham, on May 5, 2023?