The packet i did not say that. The existing 44. 1944 the question i had this a couple weeks ago in terms of rentcontrolled units the ellis act is there a legal existence of a rer8dz after that is off the marketed if those were rentcontrolled unit theyll be in rent control i imagine. Corey can chime in. Ill chime in and say this is thats a great question for the board i dont have an answer. Sure please that would be helpful if you have something you inaudible . Sir youll have to speak into the microphone. Heres something that from the San Francisco Tenants Union and as you can see there are some restrictions their 5 and 10 years that was specifically in regard to our project is the lower one. Can you read it to use it is too small for me to see. From the building is down the road and units in a newly constructed building are offered for rented one 5 years restrictions will apply so 5 years or 16 years. So it is interesting i said too to two weeks ago i thought ellis act buildings should
The packet i did not say that. The existing 44. 1944 the question i had this a couple weeks ago in terms of rentcontrolled units the ellis act is there a legal existence of a rer8dz after that is off the marketed if those were rentcontrolled unit theyll be in rent control i imagine. Corey can chime in. Ill chime in and say this is thats a great question for the board i dont have an answer. Sure please that would be helpful if you have something you inaudible . Sir youll have to speak into the microphone. Heres something that from the San Francisco Tenants Union and as you can see there are some restrictions their 5 and 10 years that was specifically in regard to our project is the lower one. Can you read it to use it is too small for me to see. From the building is down the road and units in a newly constructed building are offered for rented one 5 years restrictions will apply so 5 years or 16 years. So it is interesting i said too to two weeks ago i thought ellis act buildings should
The back and rear yard w asked the project sponsor not to do development the open space a in center the building area we dont feel the design of the front facade office that much of the old building it is a static building. Sir, your time is up. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good work my name is michelle im a Property Owner and a membership the pan in a a sixth involved in the development of the pacific avenue mcd spent many long evenings sdukz what the neighborhood wanted and work with the Planning Commission the contents the nonconforming use was of great discussion we knew that would impact. Maam, for clarity our speaking on behalf of as an individual; right . An individual yes. The consensus thought is of the nonconforming units of the group was that any nonconforming building that was significantly revised dense fizz height or exterior calls needs to meet the pacific avenue neighborhood commercial district requirement this final product was thoroughly discu
Recognizing that our neighborhood it unique and praurmentd low scale character of buildings 3 stories or less and one of the densest the city the snapshot use of development that will disrupt the neighborhood besides density what benefit does that design bring to the neighbors the pacific avenue mcd requires a 45 percent rear yard setback of a maximum height of 6, 7, 8 feet or less the project sponsor is arguing that retention the walls around the property will exempt the prop if the prevailing code this argument should states a nonconforming use and any structures occupied shall not be extended whether the proposed development is determined to be nonconforming or not the prevailing code should require the building to be brought up to code and pacific avenue is a trillion wide this 3 times the normal width of 20 to 25 foot wide and the wide it perimeter of block one 85 the massing of 40 feet the massing at 40 feet mid block it is e gregarious and should sho everyone were asking please
The back and rear yard w asked the project sponsor not to do development the open space a in center the building area we dont feel the design of the front facade office that much of the old building it is a static building. Sir, your time is up. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good work my name is michelle im a Property Owner and a membership the pan in a a sixth involved in the development of the pacific avenue mcd spent many long evenings sdukz what the neighborhood wanted and work with the Planning Commission the contents the nonconforming use was of great discussion we knew that would impact. Maam, for clarity our speaking on behalf of as an individual; right . An individual yes. The consensus thought is of the nonconforming units of the group was that any nonconforming building that was significantly revised dense fizz height or exterior calls needs to meet the pacific avenue neighborhood commercial district requirement this final product was thoroughly discu