weeks. ok. we are going to have to leave it there weeks. ok. we are going to have to leave it there for weeks. ok. we are going to have to leave it there for the weeks. ok. we are going to have to leave it there for the moment. - weeks. ok. we are going to have to l leave it there for the moment. thank you so much for your insight. to stay with us here on bbc news. plenty more to come about the settling of dominion versus fox news. and let s turn to moscow, where a court has as expected rejected the appeal against the pre trial detention of the us journalist evan gershkovich. have a look at these images of evan gershkovich appearing in court. the russian authorities accuse him of spying charges which he and his employer, the wall streetjournal, strongly deny. he appeared at the same court where, yesterday, an opponent of president putin was convicted of treason and sentenced to 25 years in prison. i m joined now by the head of the global magnitskyjustice campaign,
ve much legislation comes back. thank you very much to legislation comes back. thank you very much to jessica legislation comes back. thank you very much to jessica and - legislation comes back. thank you| very much to jessica and matthew. let s return to our breaking story. fox news and dominion voting systems have settled their landmark defamation case over the broadcaster s reporting of the last us presidential election. earlier one of dominion s lawyers, justin nelson and ceo james poulos addressed the media here s what they had to say. the truth matters. lies have consequences. over two years ago, a torrent of lies swept dominion and election officials across america. to an alternative universe of conspiracy theories, grievous harm to dominion in the country. reaction there to the settlement, and we should say we ve heard a
have you written this letter and why do you think this sets a dangerous precedent? the do you think this sets a dangerous precedent? precedent? the problem with the online safety precedent? the problem with the online safety bill precedent? the problem with the online safety bill is precedent? the problem with the online safety bill is that - precedent? the problem with the online safety bill is that it - precedent? the problem with the online safety bill is that it makes the situation worse, it allows ofcom to mandate some kind of standing technology to be embedded in every single encrypted messaging app in order to detect this particularly obnoxious abusive content. however, by doing this, it s going to expose an entire range of different content and go to allow bad actors and ex filtrate data, look these scanned messages and offensively be the equivalent to putting a cctv camera into the bedroom of every house in the countryjust in case something bad happens. fundamentally it
of public record and could potentially of public record and could potentially if of public record and could potentially if the - of public record and could potentially if the judge i of public record and could i potentially if the judge ruled of public record and could - potentially if the judge ruled them relevant potentially if the judge ruled them relevant have potentially if the judge ruled them relevant have been potentially if the judge ruled them relevant have been brought - potentially if the judge ruled them relevant have been brought up - potentially if the judge ruled them relevant have been brought up for| relevant have been brought up for his questioning relevant have been brought up for his questioning by relevant have been brought up for his questioning by dominion - relevant have been brought up for his questioning by dominion had i relevant have been brought up for. his questioning by dominion had the case proceeded his questioning by dominion had the cas