israel has to treat its arab ste citizens equally and they have to give those who lost their homes, whose homes were stolen in 1948 the right to amphetamine those homes back. there s nothing anti-semitic in that. property rights, what s anti-semitic about property rights. i think when you are defending the indefensible as many extreme supporters of israel are doing, you have no alternative but to result to smears and slurs against the people are making a very, very strong case that the united states has not done, the international community has not done what it said it wanted to do in terms of stopping occupational settlement, land theft and it s up to ordinary people to try to push their government and push people with a moral conscious to put pressure on israel so it stops all of these violations of human
legislator in the palestinian government. netanyahu said i m not going to negotiate with a government it is a surprise, frankly speaking. i expected him to fine any pretext, execute, to scuttle the talks which something he s been doing from the beginning. he has escalated settlement activities, the land theft, siege of jerusalem, the siege of gaza. he s escalated violence, done everything to destroy the talks and clutching the pretech that the palestinians are trying to reach unity, and that s something he doesn t like, because he wants to pick and choose his counterparts. by that same logic i can say i don t want to talk to the likud, netanyahu, or lieberman.
disputes on both sides. are you prepared to go back to negotiations if as the u.s. is attempting to do, you get some kind of end date, a fast track negotiations, why not sit down with the israelis again? we have nothing against negotiations at all. we don t look at negotiations as an objective or as a value on to themselves. as a means an agrument or tool. if an instrument is flawed you fix it. we ve lost more land, more lives, more resources, built a wall, they did everything possible to destroy the two-state solution. we want to go to negotiations, but we want them to have boundaries, clear timeline and end in sight and we also need to ensure that they act in accord annance with the requirements of peace, no longer unilateral measures, no longer settlement activities, no longer land theft, state of siege, hundreds of check points that destroy our