Review of the papers. It is all there for you seven days a week at bbc. Co. Uk papers, and you can see us there too, with each nights edition of the papers being posted on the page shortly after we have finished. Thank you, john and tim. Now it is time for the film review. Hello and welcome to the film review on bbc news. To take us through this weeks Cinema Releases is james king. What do we have this week . First up, fast cars and tight t shirts. It is the return of vin diesel in the fast and the furious 8. From the ridiculous to the sublime, Park Chan Wooks glamorous and amorous the handmaiden. And broadbent and rampling re live their teenage years in the pensive the sense of an ending. So fast furious 8. Have you seen the other seven . A couple. So we are onto number eight but still an impressive cast . Impressive cast, Impressive Box Office returns. This is such a huge franchise, this one will be huge. The interesting thing about the franchise is where they go with it. They have t
Awedenens that didnt know what i was talking about and understood race discrimination, but most men at that time thought that, yes, the law was rightled with genderbased distinct ons but were in womens favor. A woman didnt have to serve on a jury if they didnt want to. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity and thats what drove me as a lawyer. Charlie a rare conversation with two Supreme Court justices. E Supreme Court kicked off until october after the death of Justice Scalia. We hear about the court and love of law from two justices. Let me begin and take note of the fact that they have written books. My beloved world. And just ties ginsburgs book, in my own words. Looking back on your life and even though it was incorporated in speeches, what was that like for you to put your own life in focus and how was that . Is a my own words collection of speeches, tributes to colleagues. Rmp a pmphmpymp of me and my life is told in the introductory as my official authors have written. That will
Awedenens that didnt know what i was talking about and understood race discrimination, but most men at that time thought that, yes, the law was rightled with genderbased distinct ons but were in womens favor. A woman didnt have to serve on a jury if they didnt want to. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity and thats what drove me as a lawyer. Charlie a rare conversation with two Supreme Court justices. E Supreme Court kicked off until october after the death of Justice Scalia. We hear about the court and love of law from two justices. Let me begin and take note of the fact that they have written books. My beloved world. And just ties ginsburgs book, in my own words. Looking back on your life and even though it was incorporated in speeches, what was that like for you to put your own life in focus and how was that . Is a my own words collection of speeches, tributes to colleagues. Rmp a pmphmpymp of me and my life is told in the introductory as my official authors have written. That will
Genderbased distinctions but they all operated benignly in womens favor. Like a woman didnt have to serve on a swrir if she didnt want to. So that was a benefit. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity. And i think that that is what drove me as a lawyer. I mean i always tell people, and its not a per fk analogyk but you know lawyers are like being a voier into other peoples lives. You participate a little more than voyers do, thankfully. But you get to, in every case you get to learn about how people or an industry or a Government Entity interacts in the world, what they do and whats important to them. And to be able to enjoy that process, i think you have to have curiosity. And so listening to others in their conversations was a way of teaching myself things that i would not have otherwise learned so easily. Rose ginsburg and sotomayor for the hour next. Funding for charlie rose is provided by the following and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwi
Genderbased distinctions but they all operated benignly in womens favor. Like a woman didnt have to serve on a swrir if she didnt want to. So that was a benefit. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity. And i think that that is what drove me as a lawyer. I mean i always tell people, and its not a per fk analogyk but you know lawyers are like being a voier into other peoples lives. You participate a little more than voyers do, thankfully. But you get to, in every case you get to learn about how people or an industry or a Government Entity interacts in the world, what they do and whats important to them. And to be able to enjoy that process, i think you have to have curiosity. And so listening to others in their conversations was a way of teaching myself things that i would not have otherwise learned so easily. Rose ginsburg and sotomayor for the hour next. Funding for charlie rose is provided by the following and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwi