Test. Test test test test test test test test test test test test test test. Doug brinkley, if i could, what about criticism of Eleanor Roosevelt and throughout her 12 years as first lady . Were people critical of her . Weve kind of had a little bit of a love affair so far tonight. Of course, they were, because people didnt like fdr. A very polarizing president. He killed the opposition in 30 and 32 and i promise you eleanor was not an albatross. As i mentioned before, she was a huge asset. With that said, i think some thought her issue of pushing the labor unions and supporting the coal miners. If you were a coal owner, you would not have liked it. In the south, as i mentioned, the africanamerican issue was very controversial. In fact, theres one letter she wrote to an africanamerican person in chicago, the person wrote her because one of her columns, she called black people and this africanamerican rightly said how can you who is helping africanamericans use the word dark, and she sa
This allows them to go ahead and believe they are under danger and take a life. Thank you for letting me. Yeah. I would like to make a couple comments. One is if you actually look at the data, look at the tampa bay tribune data that,ing the for the factors in the cases, you find that minorities both blacks and hispanics are much more successful in raising stand your ground defenses than whites are. Theres another point that needs to be made, and that is the ambiguity. Its one type of ambiguity was discussed, but theres the ambiguity having to face the person who is agenting in selfdefense. Whats the appropriate amount to retreat when they have to defend themselves, and the issue here might be who do we want to make, have to make deal with that ambiguity. When somebodys facing very quick decisions that they have to make in terms of life and death. Do we want to make them bear the burden to fry to figure out if at that time how far they are going to retreat, and then make them realize th
Is that entire issue being determined in those proceedings . Not determined because the proceedings have been stayed. But three states have challenged that issue is what is at issue there . Will you finish describing the issue . I really didnt hear it. K 466 says a correction must be made in the same manner, end quote, as decision being corrected. Epas approval went through notice and comment and because of that k6 requires they go through notice and comment and corrections here did not go through notice and comment. Heres no disagreement between commissioners and respondants on that point. The United States tries to get out of that by saying they can use the good cause exception in rule making that sounded the administrator procedure act. That doesnt help epa at all because the requirement comes not from the administrative procedure act. The requirement from notice to use comments is from k6. It doesnt help epa rely on an exception to a statute when the statute does not impose the req
Roosevelt would find whichever seat was comfortable for her. She did not have an assigned a seat at this table. This is the bedroom that franklin and eleanor shared as adults. 1918, when infidelity was discovered within the marriage. From that point on, mrs. Roosevelt insisted on not sharing the same bed with Franklin Roosevelt. At that time, mrs. Roosevelt chose a bad room right next to and it has a doorway coming right in. This was an area where she could eat by herself. It was this was an area where she could be by herself. It was a bit of a private space. The furniture in this room was used by mrs. Roosevelt, one of the fear areas where she could get privacy. When they were both here, it was given they would vote here in the big house. If for some reason franklin was not at hyde park, mrs. Roosevelt was spentr own her time a couple short miles away from the site. Thehis direction we have entrance to sara delano roosevelts room, sandwiched sarah and her husband franklin, the same as
Modernizing conservatism. Here is a brief look. In 2001, before september 11, one of the big issues that the new president faced was whether and how the federal government should fund Embryonic Stem Cell Research that involves the destruction of human embryos. To all of us, this means of the taking of a human life. Whether it was moral to spend money on that public research. The president made a decision that said you could spend money on cells that already existed but not new ones, you would not be using federal dollars to encourage the further destruction of human embryos. He said these kinds of issues are going to stay with us, they are not going away and we need help in thinking about them. He called together the bioethics commission, a group of 18 scholars, almost all of them academics. They would come together several times a year and consider a bioethical question with how it Public Policy applications and provide advice to the administration and the country in the form of repor