on trade, but she sounds like a populist in almost every other economic issue. she appeared at an event in california, and you are not seeing labor pushing her hard, right? i think labor saw her silence on this as a win to some extent. and in real time, she is not supporting the president s concern the bill, and i think that would be a huge problem. once this is done in the senate, what i think you will see is labor crank up an effort to hold her before she becomes president. confident on the trail, and confident against her opponents. there is nothing in there that changes what happened in benghazi. there was at least one e-mail we know that ended up being classified. it was not classified at the time, and it was classified later, but it was on her private
place? labor advocate says that s not the case at all. you argue they were supportive of nationalizing or getting healthcare going for everybody but it was up to congress to work out the details and the president, and they saw the details and didn t like it. labor saw a situation in which americans pay far more than any other country in the world for health care, with decidedly mediocre result, and saw millions of people not insure at all so they wanted a change, as to do most americans. never been totally happy with the bill. they wanted changes made at the outset over what we re talking about right now, and they were told, i believe, that those changes would be done down the road. i don t think that labor thinks those changes have been done and that s what this is about now. neil: when they were championing the law and i was at the democratic national convention, they were cheerleading the law.