Without a championship hurts. Now, 6 planned events are gone. Removed from North Carolina in response to house bill 2. It really is harmful in in many ways. Reporter cary mayor says conservative estimates place it at 2. 5 million loss. Put that at money invested to bring the events to town. For example, laps to expand the soccer park. Improvements are underway at this tennis park and both facilities lost planned events. We are going to con move forward with these improvements hoping that we can get hb2 repealed. And that we can continue to bring these events to cary. The governor says the argument around house bill 2 will be settle if federal court. In a statement he says i strongly encourage all public and private institutions to respect and allow our nations judicial system to proceed without threats or political retaliation. However, while we wait sports be made on where to hold future championships in coming years. If it does not get changed any time soon or wrapped up in the court
Blinder and situated myself another at rh2 zoned homes income tax and nearby he can prevent inform major city around i can pretend my neighbors dont include an automobile repair shop a Large Elementary School a bu Public Library and several two and three apartment i can pretend or within a block of my neighborhood includes franklin it is another commute or the neighborhood shopping district and 6 story Apartment Buildings i can pretend i dont live in an urban environment with a mixed use with many, many household and hard work teachers and shop keermz and hundreds of neighbors that happen to have a different preference of food than me and neighbors that happen to love that market on the corner blue fog market embraces the neighborhood weve depended on to sherman Elementary School this is the paramount Elementary School to the project open hand to the st. Francis Foundation Blue fog markets listens carefully to the neighbors and acts on the concerns for example, in response to the comme
Didnt have a problem doing it, but i would find it strange if there was any less disagreement over the how much one enjoyed having to do it or whether or not we should have done it . I would be surprised if there wasnt that disagreement in the military. One of the things i find odd right here is seems like no one is disagreeing with the principle. It was just how it was handled, how it was handled, you know, saying he was a hero, given the rose garden deal and all that. It doesnt seem line the principle is one correct me if im wrong. It sounds like the principle is one you agree with. Its the principle and the price we paid. I would argue well have to pay again to deal with these gentlemen in the future. And congressman, i think that it was a good price, and i think it was worth the risk to get Sergeant Bergdahl back home. Thank you, mr. Chairman. The chair recognizes the gentleman from florida, mr. Desantis. You said, well, maybe they thought beheading bergdahl would have been better,
It so requires. Dont be fooled, she said. Only the Supreme Court so required. The federal arbitration act was never meant to produce this outcome. In the hands of todays majority, arbitration threatens to become more nearly the opposite, a mechanism easily made to block the vindication of meritorious federal claims and insulate wrongdoers from liability. The court thus undermines the federal arbitration act no less than it does the sherman act and other federal statutes providing rights of action. So, commissioner wright, in your written testimony you argue that the courts should set the rules of the road for internet openness through antitrust law. But how could a complaint of anticompetitive behavior even reach the courts if its lawful to force every consumer, Small Business and employee to arbitrate their claims in a foreign venue that is secret, thats for profit. Youre familiar with the arbitration process . No jury trial, no right to appe appeal. How does your opinion about how th
Meritorious federal claims and insulate wrongdoers from liability. The court thus undermines the federal arbitration act no less than it does the sherman act and other federal statutes providing rights of action. So, commissioner wright, in your written testimony you argue that the courts should set the rules of the road for internet openness through antitrust law. But how could a complaint of anticompetitive behavior even reach the courts if its lawful to force every consumer, Small Business and employee to arbitrate their claims in a foreign venue that is secret, thats for profit. Youre familiar with the arbitration process . No jury trial, no right to appe appeal. How does your opinion about how the internet should be regulated fare in comparison to, or in light of that Supreme Court ruling . I appreciate the question. Im going to give you two quick answers. One is there is nothing in that decision that would preclude the ftc or the doj from bringing in a case. We are not in arbitra