between the us and china ranges from taiwan and ukraine to national security and an ongoing trade dispute. janet mui, head of market analysis at rbc brewin dolphin. janet, at rbc brewin dolphin. good to have you with us. what janet, good to have you with us. what you make of this visit? as we said, the second in as many months. canjanet said, the second in as many months. can janet yellen said, the second in as many months. canjanet yellen do said, the second in as many months. can janet yellen do what the others have not yet managed to do, which is though that relationship that is particularly frosty about politics but also now economics and business two. ., but also now economics and business two. . ., ., but also now economics and business two. ., ., ., but also now economics and business two. thanks for having me. i think it is a difficult two. thanks for having me. i think it is a difficult task two. thanks for having me. i think it is a difficult task for two. tha
is the contagious buying chinese products. yes, that is the contagious point. buying chinese products. yes, that is the contagious point. i buying chinese products. yes, that is the contagious point. i think- is the contagious point. i think both countries need each other and this is very difficult result. fundamentally try they want to share china on its technological ambition particularly on. sex as the us restricting the export of the semiconductors to china and tit for tat china recently reduced export of critical metals to bless the world. this is likely to be ongoing. can t see how this is actually being result given the technological rivalry between countries is not going to go away. we should not expect to much but it is good to have a dialect would avoid further misunderstanding and miscalculation between two countries. good to have a dialogue. countries. good to have a dialogue- countries. good to have a dialoue. . ,. . ., , ., dialogue. fascinating to see how t
the financial capital to world, is immune. climate scientists tell us it is not too late to keep alive the la 5 degree goal of the paris agreement but the window is rapidly closing. we need 45% cut in emission by 2030. yet, a cent un report made clear that with present national climate commitments, emission also go climate commitments, emission also 9° up climate commitments, emission also go up by i6%, by 2030. that would condemn us to temperature rises of at least 2.7 degrees above preindustrial levels. a catastrophe. meanwhile, the oecd reported the gap of at least $20 billion us in essential and promised finance to the developing country, we are weeks away from un climate conference in