step inspect and continue the investigations until they reach their natural conclusion, which i would point out that there hasn t been one shred of evidence put forward saying there s some kind of coordination between the campaign and some foreign nation. so i think it s a wild goose chase. i think wiel have a steadier hand behind the wheel at the fbi. a very important thing to point out, there s not one person who s been on, has stood up and advocated and said that drosh comey was doing a good job and should stay in place. no one is saying he should stay where he was. i talked to senator cory booker a few days ago and he slammed director comey. i asked not once but twice, would you support him being fired. he would not do that. there was criticism but it stopped sort of saying he should be fired and that s a significant distinction. of course now with president trump being in the white house, they re going to go right up to
have been pud up. but three years ago, the atheists moved in demand they can got some displays as well. of course, they mock christianity, among other religions. so city of san ma monica said no displays at all. now it s in court. joining us to analyze, our legal team, wiel, the wrists seem to be winning. they are because a judge said look, to the churches, you can t have that nativity scene up because we re banning all of it. we re banning the church stuff, the christian stuff, jewish stuff. we re ban bill: why? everybody. because what they said was, what the city council said was, we can have all this stuff here, we re having vandalism. it s dossing us money and plus in santa monica wants to look at the ocean. bill: so it s disruptive and so who is suing? who is taking it in? this is actually pretty interesting because you got a couple of groups here that have aligned together. the santa monica police department association and the nativity scene committee who are
but three years ago, the atheists moved in demand they can got some displays as well. of course, they mock christianity, among other religions. so city of san ma monica said no displays at all. now it s in court. joining us to analyze, our legal team, wiel, the wrists seem to be winning. they are because a judge said look, to the churches, you can t have that nativity scene up because we re banning all of it. we re banning the church stuff, the christian stuff, jewish stuff. we re ban bill: why? everybody. because what they said was, what the city council said was, we can have all this stuff here, we re having vandalism. it s dossing us money and plus in santa monica wants to look at the ocean. bill: so it s disruptive and so who is suing? who is taking it in? this is actually pretty interesting because you got a couple of groups here that have aligned together. the santa monica police department association and the nativity scene committee who are trying to keep this nativ
but three years ago, the atheists moved in demand they can got some displays as well. of course, they mock christianity, among other religions. so city of san ma monica said no displays at all. now it s in court. joining us to analyze, our legal team, wiel, the wrists seem to be winning. they are because a judge said look, to the churches, you can t have that nativity scene up because we re banning all of it. we re banning the church stuff, the christian stuff, jewish stuff. we re ban bill: why? everybody. because what they said was, what the city council said was, we can have all this stuff here, we re having vandalism. it s dossing us money and plus in santa monica wants to look at the ocean. bill: so it s disruptive and so who is suing? who is taking it in? this is actually pretty interesting because you got a couple of groups here that have aligned together. the santa monica police department association and the nativity scene committee who are trying to keep this nativ
to carry. you are out that way. but there s also a walgreen policy, i understand, that you don t escalate, right? he s saying he was fired and that s why there s a federal lawsuit that he got the attorneys to file for him because he violated, supposedly, the nonescalation policy. but the video clearly shows he did not escalate. you are trying to shoot him but the robber s gun misfires. he has to standstill and be a human target. we all agree walgreens is wrong, they shouldn t have fired him. wrong, yes. so now we are going to make an appeal. wiel? please, hire him pack and give him his back payor he s look at a business settlement. he s a great american and was defending himself. the manager was taken hostage. you are talking directly to the walgreens executives. yes, retire jerry. i want you both to call the ceo of walgreens, who we will name next week, and ask him personally to hire jeremy back