actions might have caused harm to our national security. curiously, republicans on the hill aren t asking those same questions. in fact, most don t seem very fazed at all by this. the hypocrisy of folks in my party, that spent years spending wiping a server, are now out there defending a man who very clearly did not take the national security of the united states to heart, and will be up to the doj whether or not that reaches a level of indictment. but, this is disgusting, in my mind, and no president should act this way, obviously. it is disgusting. republicans are silent, because what trump did was wrong, and they know it. he potentially put the united states in danger, there is no doubt about it. and worse, he is still putting americans in danger, as the washington post reports, trump and his cronies have put rank and file civil servants in harm s way after the mar-a-lago search. attorney general garland faced online assassination threats, he decried the rising unfou
washington post. kurt medulla, and a former spokesperson for the house oversight committee. and christina greer, an associate professor of political science at fordham university, she s also author of black ethnics, and editor of jennifer, i ll start with you, the gop hypocrisy. it s no longer surprising, i would say, but it is getting dangerous, no? it absolutely is. you alluded to the national archives. of course, the fbi had an attempted assault on their facility in cincinnati. and now you hear republicans talking like mobsters. you indict this guy, there will be violence. and that is just thug top. that s how they re behaving. i have to say, that old though the republican party, the elected officials are really the genesis for this, really hateful and dangerous conversation, it s the voters