Tomorrow, the british Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, Will Travel To Washington to discuss it with him. Lets talk about the decision because the calibration have to because the calibration have to be very careful. Time is of Course Tort because we have a us election upon us and we are what Donald Trump said on tuesday not when asked whether he wanted ukraine to win. What do you Thinkjoe Biden will be thinking about when he meets Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow . Is Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow . Is possible we might see the us not objecting to the uk sitting its long Range Storm Shadow missiles its long Range Storm Shadow missiles and the french version as Well Missiles and the french version as well to missiles and the french version as well to at least allow the ukrainians to send those type of weapons further and deeper into russian territory, but of course into russian territory, but of course they cannot go as deep as the course they cannot go as deep as the us course they cannot go as d
To strike russian territory. He said this would change the nature of the conflict, and mean the us and other nato countries were fighting with russia. The british prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer, who is currently heading to washington, is expected to discuss the use of such missiles with President Biden on friday. Damian grammaticas reports. Two and a half years after vladimir putin launched his invasion of ukraine, and almost nightly russian bombs and missiles continue to batter the country. Strikes launched from deep inside russia. To counter these, ukraine has for months been urging the west to allow it to use the long range weapons they already supply to hit back, against airfields, logistics and military targets that sustain these assaults, and to blunt the Advances Russia is making on the ground. For ukraine, the timing, with winter coming, is critical, so on the agenda for Sir Keir Starmer heading to washington with the foreign secretary, whether to green light attacks on russi
Donald trump says the tv debate was rigged against him, and he was asked this in the spin room afterwards. What did you think of the moderators what did you think of the moderators fact what did you think of the moderators fact checking what did you think of the moderators fact checking you throughout? i think the moderators were very unfair. Trump supporters described it as three against one because he was fact checked more than kamala harris. But he said much more that was not true. In springfield, they are eating the cats, they are eating the dogs. It prompted one of the more unlikely fact checks. There have been no credible reports of pets being harmed by the individuals. Well, i ve seen people on television. . . After sourcing that claim to people on television, trump also said this. Her vice presidential pick says abortion in the ninth month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth, execution, no longer abortion, because the baby is born, is ok. And that s not ok
And he was asked this in the spin room afterwards. What did you think of the moderators fact checking you throughout? i think the moderators were very unfair. Trump supporters described it as three against one because he was fact checked more than kamala harris. But he said much more that was not true. In springfield, they are eating the cats, they are eating the dogs. They are eating the pets of the people that live there. It prompted one of the more unlikely fact checks. Abc news did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there city manager there. He told us there had city manager there. He told us there had been no credible reports there had been no credible reports of specific claims of its being reports of specific claims of its being harmed, orabuse within its being harmed, orabuse within the immigrant community. Well, i ve seen people on television. . . After sourcing that claim to people on television, trump also said this. Her vice presidential pick says abor
So, obviously, my immediate question was, can we go? can we get there? setting it up with the ukrainians was not the hard bit. Actually, it was convincing my editors and, you know, layers of management back at the times that this was a safe thing to do, or that we could mitigate the risks involved in it. Because they weren t just about the danger there. They were also these legal risks about. . . . . The legal consequences of illegally crossing into russia, which is how the russian government have perceived the trip. But you obviously persuaded them, cos you went. Just to explain, then, who you did speak to and what the terms were. I suppose the question is, whether you were changing names to protect russians, because getting people, presumably, in russia to speak candidly to western journalists must be very hard? well, yeah, these are people who lived in a very quiet corner of russia, and probably had never had anything to do with a journalist, even a russian journalist, never mind a