there s an irs spokesperson that came out and said quote, it is ludicrous and untrue to the just that the senior irs official somehow targeted specific individuals for national research program audits. let s talk about the reporting that you have though, about the likelihood of that even happening. statistically when you look at things, what do you make of it? is it some strange coincidence, or is it something else? yeah i mean, i think the important thing from the statement you just read is that word specific. so what we are doing here is we are sort of after the fact going back and trying to assess how likely is it that these two particular individuals would be picked up for audits. the answer to that is it is microscopically unlikely. the odds that, if you set out to pick mccabe and kony as getting audits, the odds are really really really low. but the new york times also had a piece by their upshot group which does a lot of graph analysis, which pointed out that there are a lot o
grand jury, they came back with an indictment and dismisses the charges in the indictment and then they tried to say that that is because of criminal justice perform. i had to question all along and type asking now. how many black and brown people are being prosecuted in cook county right now for low, low level offenses where they are of been giving victor kony an option of either pleading guilty or going to jail but not jussie smollett because jussie smollett for some reason, he will end up having these charges dropped despite the gravity of this offense. so looking at it from an african american community, i would be upset, one, that he has lessons of the power of the hate crime statute that you need because that does exist. and secondarily, all of those lower so cnm, poor people who don t have power to him who don t have prolific judge, who don t have great lawyers, they will be guilty and go to jail but jussie smollett dropped the charges and she tries to justify it.
kony and restrictions and the worst thing you can do in public health is guidance that nobody will follow. just to take it seriously and those variance could come back to make it necessary to maintain restrictions. we can live in a nuclear bomb shelter for fear we could get nuclear war and at some point you have to assess the risk and right now is it is extremely low the risk of influenza is much higher but you would never see these enacted for influenza or those mask requirements or where a double mask in the student campus population that is required to have two doses and already students the lowest
kony and restrictions and the worst thing you can do in public health is guidance that nobody will follow. just to take it seriously and those variance could come back to make it necessary to maintain restrictions. we can live in a nuclear bomb shelter for fear we could get nuclear war and at some point you have to assess the risk and right now is it is extremely low the risk of influenza is much higher but you would never see these enacted for influenza or those mask requirements or where a double mask in the student campus population that is required to have two doses and already students the lowest risk people in america but no
kony and restrictions and the worst thing you can do in public health is guidance that nobody will follow. just to take it seriously and those variance could come back to make it necessary to maintain restrictions. we can live in a nuclear bomb shelter for fear we could get nuclear war and at some point you have to assess the risk and right now is it is extremely low the risk of influenza is much higher but you would never see these enacted for influenza or those mask requirements or where a double mask in the student campus population that is required to have two doses and already students the lowest