Referring to the decision of Bombay High court in the case of PCIT v. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt Ltd. [2017] 84 taxmann.com 58 (Pan), the Kolkata ITAT deleted the addition made towards share.
On finding that the addition is based upon conjecture and surmises and not on records which were available before the authorities, the Kolkata ITAT set aside the order passed by the CIT(A) and.
Abiding by the principle of judicial hierarchy and binding precedent, the Kolkata ITAT directed the AO to consider only the investments yielding tax exempt income for computation of disallowance under.
Pointing that applications are to be considered on merit for grant of registration, the Kolkata ITAT relegate the issue to the file of CIT(E) with a direction that application in Form No. 10AB should.
Finding that the AO without examining any of the documents, simply made the addition u/s 68 on account of failure of assessee to produce share subscribers, the Kolkata ITAT held that AO cannot take.