separate investigation. and i don t know durham, so i have no personal opinion of him. but if he the u.s. attorney in connecticut. u.s. attorney in connecticut who has been assigned to do this investigation of the 2016 election, which is long over and i don t know why we re still looking at it. but if he s so terrific, why didn t he say to william barr, i got this. you assigned me, let me do the investigation. don t ply to rome with me. don t fly around the country. i m going to handle it. pit looks bad to have you on this, because then it looks like it s a political thing, not a legitimate investigation. and that s how i see it. is it doesn t look legitimate as long as barr is following him around. if he wants to investigate, fine. but let it be a legitimate investigation. right now, there seems to be no basis for spending money to investigate something that s been investigated and rejected as a conspiracy theory with no factual support. it s a nice shiny object to point to.