. what s life been like for your family since then? we re trying to put it back together. i miss the things we had together. i miss the simple conversations. i miss her sassiness, her wonderful personality. she lives on forever in our hearts. conrad is left looking backward and forward. i d do anything to take another day, another walk with her. i loved her. i do love her still. you have a lot of life left. how are you going to live it? to the best of my abilities. there are jurors who think he might have done temperature bit reasonable doubt and i couldn t convict. god bless them. there are a lot of people who do believe in me.
those hearings did not increase the percentage of americans who think the punishment should be a senate conviction and removal from office. let s break down the numbers. number one, just the threshold. should the president be impeached and removed from office? 50% of americans, so half, say yes. 43% say no. the issue is this. watch how this is made out over time. if you go back to march, 36% the democrats have made progress in prosecuting their case. in october 50% says impeach and remove. after the hearings, 50%, the same number say impeach and remove. so the public hearings didn t increase the number of americans who say remove the president from office. 90% of democrats say impeach and remove. only 10% of republicans say impeach and remove. most republicans are safe voting no. we won t impeach or no, we won t convict. independents, 47% say impeach and remove.
were voting on or for. was it a resolution, inquiry, what was it? and that s going to take some time to do that. absolutely. i think really in some ways it s a legal issue but really political and they ll have to explain at the minimum they voted to continue the investigation of the president and i think everybody knows they are going to vote and it will be impeachment and go to senate and they probably won t convict. no rights for the minority unless the chair so designates. in fact, in this resolution it allows the chair to veto even the ability for the president to have legal counsel in the room. if the chair chooses at his whim they can kick out the president s legal counsel. this is unprecedented. it is not only unprecedented, this is soviet-style rules. maybe in the soviet union you do things like that where only you make the rules, where you reject the ability for the person you are accusing to even be in the room. to question what s going on.
beneficial to us because of our oath of office to bring impeachment. i think he deserves it. he s created impeachable offense, politically, it would get our base out. this election is about your base coming out to vote. that s beyond the imperative of re1307b8ding to your oath and acting on it. i also think the senate they won t convict. i think if the hearings come up, we will get more witnesses, trump is stopping us from getting, mcgahn and possibly even barr, certainly mueller and hope hicks and lady donaldson to come before us the case will be made and more people will be for impeachment. by the time it go etc. to the senate, they won t vote to impeach him. the republicans own o enwwon t, will be toast because the red folks in their states will vote
through and link up to the charges in the indictment that could take some time. and so i don t think getting to the point of a day and a half of deliberations is anything out of the ordinary at all at this point. it doesn t really read like that means they will hang or they won t convict. it s just sifting through a fairly sizeable mountain of evidence. dana: one the great things about our judicial system the jurors it could be a baker, the candle stick maker all sorts of different people. they come together. they re not financial experts. they are looking through 388 pieces of evidence. highly technical. and they are trying to work it all through. could it be that they are just one to be very diligent. some of us think of course they would want to go home for the weekend. maybe we have to give some more credit. they take things quite seriously. my experience is most jurors do take it very seriously. they feel compelled when they know it s an important trial and know it s a very