That map. Thank you for the information. Appreciate it. So i am going to move to approve. Second. Commissioner johnson . Thank you very much. I think that this is a good project not only physically for the use of the pdr space in the neighborhood and also for the networks that we are trying to support. And i just have a few questions, and we will see if the answers to this might be augment commissioner antonini motion and the first one is, sorry, it is about the underground utility. And i know that in some of the materials provided by the project sponsor i am not sure if this was a commentary or an actual assessment of something that might happen. But there was a comment made in one of the documents that the underground utility could replace, and overhead wiring, and as i was wondering if that is something that was going to happen or just in the documentation. Pg e was going to run more north. And we are really the first need, to kick that project off for them. And so they are going to
Its something that the commission struggled with there should be changes to the project deferring opinions that was continued for several hearings for the sponsor to work with the department some changes were proposed and ultimately at the place Planning Commission hamburger no concession on the direction to move forward and because of that any failure will result in the project no discretionary review was taken and the project move forward thats the brief summary of the project as i say to the excision i think you already know even if a project is code compliant the board of appeals are will have the discretion do make the changes the excision choose not to make changes some reason proposed by itself project sponsor but didnt go to the extent that the appellant wanted to have im available for questions. Have you confirmed that the two or three changes that did project sponsor made after the dr hearing were incorporated into this set we have and i believe see because the real issue the
Of speakeof speakers calling names whoever is ready. Somebody please approach the podium to submit their testimony. Theres no requirement. Whosoever ready. Can you hear me well yes. My name is anna im talking in behalf of my husband we live in one thousand two street with two toddlers we ask the Planning Department to formerly reflect the developers variance request in order to preserve the integrity of the neighborhood we also concerned about the buildings being here this is a a direct impact on my property with air and sun this is directly effecting my childrens ive from him south america and the impact on the air is immense immense is horrible im hoping youll not allow this to happen im sorry you protect the residents their right to air and light thank you. Can i turn that on. My name is hugh diamond i live on ashbury street i wish to comment the folks asserts the folks in the immediate area dont share the defense lawyers requesters this is over 50 immediate eggs e. R. Neighbors and
Podium to submit their testimony. Theres no requirement. Whosoever ready. Can you hear me well yes. My name is anna im talking in behalf of my husband we live in one thousand two street with two toddlers we ask the Planning Department to formerly reflect the developers variance request in order to preserve the integrity of the neighborhood we also concerned about the buildings being here this is a a direct impact on my property with air and sun this is directly effecting my childrens ive from him south america and the impact on the air is immense immense is horrible im hoping youll not allow this to happen im sorry you protect the residents their right to air and light thank you. Can i turn that on. My name is hugh diamond i live on ashbury street i wish to comment the folks asserts the folks in the immediate area dont share the defense lawyers requesters this is over 50 immediate eggs e. R. Neighbors and those people with me totally tonight believe me when we share you guys have been
The rear of the rear yard was to be nor longer that the others property. They held a meeting and the biesh lee library we reiterated our concerns they rereiterated their concerns and july 15, 2013, that was unknown to me the folks wanted to have an arrangement this lot is a corner lot to be the intersection between downey precedes, however, numerous dmfgsz between myself and scott it was discovered that is planner had the project sponsor withheld facts this information is not disclosed at the time he looked at the conditions theres been huge opposition from the neighborhood weve got signature of a petition over 50 signatures opposing this project so in summary i want to deny the variance those being a blatant i cannot fearful indication of the facts the va is well aware you have that and lacks justification theres a excessive impact do the which a ton street and air theres insignificant opposition and broad opposition to the variance. In terms of the dr im suggesting or requesting that