RIYADH: King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) and its King Abdulaziz and King Khalid Hospitals in Saudi Arabia have been listed among the best hospitals internationally for the year 2022 have been listed by US magazine Newsweek. The ratings was given based on improved performance indicators in healthcare, infection control measures, patient safety, and other indicators
Dr. Faisal Abdullah Al-Saif has been CEO of the Abha-based King Faisal Medical City since 2021. Al-Saif, who worked as an adviser at the Health Ministry’s vision realization office for almost 10 months in 2019, has also been vice president of the central business unit at the Health Holding Co. in Riyadh since 2019. He covered the company’s Eastern Province business unit from
RIYADH: The findings of an international study on the effectiveness of blood thinners in reducing COVID-19-related deaths have been published in the British Medical Journal, with the King Saud University Medical City Clinical Research Unit playing a key role. The comparative scientific research, which included King Saud University Medical City, King Faisal Specialist Hospital,
Virtual handover of patients during the covid-19 crisis dovepress.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dovepress.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the KSUMC Institutional Review Board, reference number (Ref. No. 20/0497/IRB). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient consent to review their medical records was not required by the KSUMC Institutional Review Board due to the anonymized data collection and maintained with confidentiality.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs) and compared using one-way ANOVA to test the difference between variables and three groups of FRS. The categorical data were presented as numbers and percentages (%) and compared using the Chi-square test to determine whether there are significant differences between variables and three levels of FRS. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associat