nation as a larger problem regarding media. i don t think it is going to happen within this context of this investigation. it is an education for the american people about the value of their involvement and the choices they make in the elections and what they demand of their elected leaders. this is going to have two acquirrequire in overturning. it is the nature of the people have been in situation to and long. mueller is being seen as part of that. rod rosenstein and the choices that jeff session makes. i have been an amount of his which has declined a bit in the pushback from the swamp. in the present still has to deal with that. steve: we talked about this before, the 2016 election was the beginning of the populace revolution. not the end. kimberly, let s pick up what
attacks, the behavior of james comey, certainly of mccabe, all of these individuals were behaving in a manner that if you look at that at a glance, it s clearly problematic. for some reason, they felt it wouldn t be an issue. they felt they could behave in this manner probably because i thought hillary was going to win. it tells you they re comfortable with this framework. that tells you it s a deep-seated and long-term way of operating. in a lot of ways it confirms the importance and results of the 2016 election. the nature of how the establishment was handled has to change. we have to change out the individuals running it. more than just the president. it s a long-term framework. the conversation is important, that kimberly can write this article and have it be read and we can have this conversation. this goes to social media aspect which will be addressing as a
attacks, the behavior of james comey, certainly of mccabe, all of these individuals were behaving in a manner that if you look at that at a glance, it s clearly problematic. for some reason, they felt it wouldn t be an issue. they felt they could behave in this manner probably because i thought hillary was going to win. it tells you they re comfortable with this framework. that tells you it s a deep-seated and long-term way of operating. in a lot of ways it confirms the importance and results of the 2016 election. the nature of how the establishment was handled has to change. we have to change out the individuals running it. more than just the president. it s a long-term framework. the conversation is important, that kimberly can write this article and have it be read and we can have this conversation. this goes to social media aspect which will be addressing as a
this is all been completely dry. podesta, prominent democrat, and this is what americans look at. it gets to the heart of the frustration. now that justice is being applied to people who have done wrong doings, it is only being applied to one side. steve: exactly right. you put it well. everyone should read your piece. talk about mind to the fbi. there is so much there. let s bring in tammy bruce now. tammy, you heard all of that, what chances do you think there are for what kimberly is advocating that you have equal justice of these things be looked at ever happy? whatever pressure can we put on? the players involved a representation of an establishment that has operated like this for quite some time. we see in the lead up to the election the sloppiness and what we have seen investigated whether it s peter struck of
rosenstein and other officials at the justice department thursday in an attempt to resolve the standoff. the republicans are seeking access to information that could raise new and perhaps disturbing questions about surveillance abuses by the fbi during the 2016 campaign. our own kimberly strauss has been reporting on this issue. she joins us now. so kim, tell us what we need to know here about this latest line of inquiry from devin nunes and why it matters. so here s what we know is based on some leaking that went on to the washington post, we know that this inquiry is focused on a source, a top secret source within that the fbi used, it was part of its russia collusion investigation, this is a u.s. citizen, and i think this is really important, paul, because when intelligence operations or the fbi refer to sources, they re not talking about their internal people. they re usually talking about