Kim Waily News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

CNNW At This Hour With Kate Bolduan June 4, 2018 15:00:00

Justice sotomayor said, look, even though the commission may have made commissioners may have made disparaging comments about religion, this was assessed by other entities, by courts, and there was no need to say that the context here affected t case. That these two individuals did face discrimination and it should be read as that. So they were the only two that broke off, but as i say, Justice Kennedy, i think he wanted to caution everyone in the courtroom, and probably anyone reading this opinion, that this is a very small step in the case of these particular men. Again, Justice Ginsburg and sotomayor said otherwise, but i think it really opens the door to what would come next from the next case. I would just add one other thing, Justice Kennedy noted that in 2012, when this had happened, colorado was not is interesting, how this is going to play out over the next six months or so. And i said, well, explain. He said, well, is going to bed by republicans as an effort for freedom, for

Here affectedt caseJustice kennedyBroke offJustice ginsburgJohn dowdHot buttonGay marriage decisionMajority opinionGay rights in america2015 yeah thisMasterpiece bakersJack phillipsGovernment punishmentDonald trump jrRudy giulianiSupreme court

CNN CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto December 10, 2021 14:15:00

it up or not. yeah. and i think these justices do think about what the implications are going to be for the next president. they always have done that. but, again, the way the law works is there are different politicians and there are rules and standards that govern judges. unless you get to the supreme court. then there is really nothing. and up until recently, the court has consistently apolitically for the most part, with some exceptions, followed those rules of conduct. it is not the case now. when people talk about packing a court, that is should congress expand the court, i think it is really unpacking the court, because we are in the moment where this court already is politicized, and we have to just keep an eye on it going forward. kim, thanks so much. thank you. still to come this hour, jussie smollett guilty of falsely reporting a hate crime. now will face sentencing. how much jail time could he see? new this hour, the cia is revamping its entire spy program. how it

Supreme courtKim wailyHate crimeJussie smollettSpy program

CNN CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto December 10, 2021 14:10:00

decision coming out last night. the timeline here is critical as you point out. this is 14 days, like, 14-day pause on the appeals court decision. so that means the trump team has 14 days to try to get the supreme court to see it their way and possibly take this case up. if the supreme court does that, it will be because four people on the supreme court said that they think this is at least worth hearing. we need four votes to hear this case. a very short timeline. but certainly an uphill battle because the appeals court was definitive in their explanation that this has no merit. the trump team, however, saying this morning and last night that this was always destined for the supreme court. so i guess we ll see. indeed we will. we will be watching, whitney wild, thank you. to dig deeper, kim waily, law professor at the university of baltimore. i was struck by something i heard last night. kim is also the author of how to read the constitution and why, a book i need because i m

Supreme courtLast nightAppeals court decisionAppeals courtUphill battleWhitney wildKim wailyDig deeperUniversity of baltimore

CNN CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto December 10, 2021 14:11:00

not a law professor. you a harvard law professor said to cnn last night that in addition to this decision pointing out that trump s legal team had not ex- explained the why there, that it also went on to say this was a clear effort to delay the efforts of the committee. trying to mess with congress. and he said that was code that was a sign to the supreme court not to take up this case. would you agree? i think the full 68-page opinion was assigned to the united states supreme court to not take up the case because they also signalled in there that this was their the president, the former president s claims that this was a political maneuver, that it was somehow improper were just flat out wrong in that they couldn t even dispute that this information is, of course, relevant. i unfortunately, you know, these are three more progressive, i

Donald trumpKim wailyCnn last nightSupreme courtJoe biden

CNN CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto February 8, 2021 15:18:15

CNN CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto February 8, 2021 15:18:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

It doesnt apply to donald trumpUnited statesDavid gurgenImpeachment defense strategyAssistant attorneyKim wailyThe new york times