share an interest, ultimately, following the experience with their aircraft in weakening isil. they are investing at this point in propping up assad. they think the way to fight isil is to have a strong government in damascus under assad. we think the way to fight isil is to have a legitimate government and we think assad, by virtue of killing hundreds of thousands of his own citizens has lost all legitimacy. he has to go. the majority population who are sunni in syria feel they have an opportunity to govern, not exclusively but proportionate to their population if that s how they choose to vote. the challenge is not so much in terms of agreeing on the ends.
religious connotations to his criticism in all of this. i think the only reason he didn t go full out on john kerry is that they re waiting to call barack obama judas. right? because, after possibility just pilate, what do you have left? i guess there s satan. tom cotton. regardless of his youthful looks and lack of experience is really the front man in a lot of ways for the neo con conservative wing of the republican party. the same people who told us again and again that iraq would be a cake walk box lead to democracy throughout the region and have yet to apologize for not finding wmds and for killing hundreds of thousands of iraqis and tens of thousands, several thousands americans and injuring tens of thousands of gis. they have no credibility on this
by tuesday putin peace maker was already setting conditions and keir simmons is reporting that russian officials have been meeting behind closed doors. i want to pick up on michael s point. you have a man accused of killing hundreds of thousands and 400 children with chemical weapons and vladimir putin not in the slatest someone that could believe has the best interest of the united states in any of his decisions. what do you make here of who do we trust? well, you know, i think that trust will only get you so far, which is why they want to get this process moving quickly, why the administration wants to make pretty clear. you ideally would like to have early tests and united nations and public commitments where people are you at least get people to make commitments to show good faith but then you have strong verification every step of the way. it s the only way you can do it. there will be some element of
obviously, of ed snowden s. osama bin laden and al-qaeda have been explicit, they have been explicit. and they wrote and said that we attacked. we attacked america because you had bases on our holy land in saudi arabia. you do not give palestinians fair treatment. and you have been bombing i didn t say that. i am trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing. at the same time, we had been bombing and killing hundreds of thousands of iraqis for ten years. would you be annoyed? if you re not annoyed, then there is some problem. did ed snowden say that, for example, like ron paul, that he thought that osama bin laden and al-qaeda were provoked in their actions by actions of the united states? i don t remember having conversations about that. so i really can t speak to that.
and they wrote and said that we attacked. we attacked america because you had bases on our holy land in saudi arabia. you do not give palestinians fair treatment. and you have been bombing i didn t say that. i am trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing. at the same time, we had been bombing and killing hundreds of thousands of iraqis for ten years. would you be annoyed? if you re not annoyed, then there is some problem. did ed snowden say that, for example, like ron paul, that he thought that osama bin laden and al-qaeda were provoked in their actions by actions of the united states? i don t remember having conversations about that. so i really can t speak to that. i m sorry. and just one more detail of that kind. anything about israel, ron paul, for example wants to end all aid to israel? was that something that ed