he s demonstratishonest. it s clear the pollsters have told him to come out on the attack. if he wants to call me a liar, that s fine, but john adams famously said facts are stubborn things. wow. he was ready for that. he was ready for that. he s much taller, i noticed, than cruz. he is, go ahead. is trump the new let me try something. i think cruz, why would he like trump? he said his father killed kennedy. give me a break. he did. so he invited him when he was in trouble. now he s up in the polls and i think he probably wished he didn t invite him in, just thinking. but the real test here is are you supporting trump s agenda? there are lots of republicans that don t like his persona, but they like his policies. there s a large group of republicans that like both. but the bottom line is that ted cruz voted 91% with the trump
who wrote a book claiming that lbj killed kennedy. there would be medical records that if somebody really wanted to they could. have you talked to him about this poisoning. it is ludicrous. in terms of assange, you know, he had spoken to us in july and august of 2018. and his desire. and one of the things i find striking about all of this is why he wouldn t have wanted us to be there if he didn t meet with assange, it would have puffed up his role in the campaign. if mueller has been asking questions about him, to sam nunberg and others should it be a concern to roger stone that he hasn t been asked to come in and
it is very hard to draw those conclusions right away. i m always afraid of cherry-picking information, because there s got to be a document behind that that s going to contradict what you just saw. interesting, the size of this investigation. you get that clearly in 1963 in terms of the fbi notices flying back and forth. i think that one of the things we can find is exactly what dr. baden was talking about before, what the cia has always held back. remember, this was an intelligence agency, tucker, that lied to the warren commission when the warrenme commission was doing its own investigation on who killed kennedy. they didn t want the commission to find out that they were in league with the mafia to kill a head of state not kennedy, but castro. that didn t come out for another ten years. they ve always been concerned about what became public from all of the anti-castro work. i think we will find some of that here, but maybe not in this release. according to the cia, they re holdin
i m always afraid of cherry-picking information, because there s got to be a document behind that that s going to contradict what you just saw. interesting, the size of this investigation. you get that clearly in 1963 in terms of the fbi notices flying back and forth. i think that one of the things we can find is exactly what dr. baden was talking about before, what the cia has always held back. remember, this was an intelligence agency, tucker, that lied to the warren commission when the warrenme commission was doing its own investigation on who killed kennedy. they didn t want the commission to find out that they were in league with the mafia to kill a head of state not kennedy, but castro. that didn t come out for another ten years. they ve always been concerned about what became public from all of the anti-castro work. i think we will find some of that here, but maybe not in this release. according to the cia, they re holding back. they want to redact about 1% of the 18,000 cia d
recently released. what did they tell us? anything interesting? it is very hard to draw those conclusions right away. i m always afraid of cherry picking information, because there s got to be a document behind that that s going to contradict what you just are. very interesting, the size of this investigation. you get that clarity in 1963 in terms of the fbi notices flying back and forth. i think that one of the things we can find is exactly what dr. baden was talking about before, with the cia has always held back. remember, this was an intelligence agency, tucker, that lied to the warren commission when the warren commission was doing its own investigation on who killed kennedy. they didn t want the commission to find out that they were in league with the mafia to kill a head of state not kennedy, but castro. that didn t come up for another ten years. they ve always been concerned about what we can public from all of the anti-castro work. i think we will find some of that here, b