chapman, it seems, has back-ups. so he brought the gun with him, came to new york. and had planned at that point to kill someone who was a celebrity in order to bring attention to himself. lennon wasn t his only target. he had a list of substitute targets, if you will. if he couldn t get to lennon, then he would have attempted to kill walter cronkite, johnny carson, george c. scott, jackie kennedy onassis, or marlon brando. any of these people were his potential targets after lennon. lennon was his first choice. even so, chapman s agenda included a wild scheme to kill scott while the actor was on stage in a broadway show. the defendant said he had front row seats and his plan was to stand up in the middle of the show, take his gun, and fire into the body of george c. scott. it wasn t a particularly adroit
attention on the wrong area? probably these are the same type of people who say we shouldn t be writing about or studying aids because it s a very unpleasant, deadly topic. we have an opportunity for a guy like mark chapman who has agreed to open himself up for exploration and study to hopefully prevent other mark david chapmans from coming along. people who criticize journalists for exploring people like that i think disappoint. it gives him publicity for this horrendous act he committed. the killers become as famous as the people they killed. and it s really unfortunate. as with almost any famous tragic event, conspiracy theories have sprouted up regarding the shooting of john lennon. the prevailing scenario has mark david chapman as a patsy, programmed by mysterious government operatives to kill lennon. there was absolutely no evidence
shouldn t be writing about or studying aids because it s a deadly topic. we have an opportunity for a guy like mark chapman who has agreed to open himself up for exploration and study to hopefully prevent other mark david chapmans from coming along. people who criticize journalists for exploring people like that i think disappoint. it gives him publicity for this horrendous act he committed. the killers become as face as the people they killed. and it s really unfortunate. as with almost any famous tragic event, conspiracy theories have sprouted up regarding the shooting. john lennon. the prevailing scenario has mark david chapman as a patsy, programmed by mysterious government operatives to kill lennon. there was absolutely no evidence that he was assisted or aids by another person. he was simply someone who acted alone without assistance of other people.
was a celebrity to bring attention to himself. lennon wasn t his only target. he had a list of substitutes, if you will. if he couldn t get to lennon, he would have attempted to kill walter cronkite, johnny carson, george c. scott, jackie kennedy onassis or marlon brando. lennon was his first choice. even show, chapman s agenda included a wild scheme to kill scott while the actor was on stage at a broadway show. the defendant said he had front row seats, and his plan was to stand up in the middle of the show and fire into the body of george c. scott. it wasn t attic laterally adroit plan because when he went to the gun store to buy bullets to have ammunition for his gun, he was
him, came to new york. had planned to kill someone who was a celebrity to bring attention to himself. lennon wasn t his only target. he had a list of substitutes, if you will. if he couldn t get to lennon, he would have attempted to kill walter cronkite, johnny carson, george c. scott, jackie kennedy onassis or marlon brando. lennon was his first choice. even show, chapman s agenda included a wild scheme to kill scott while the actor was on stage at a broadway show. the defendant said he had front row seats, and his plan was to stand up in the middle of the show and fire into the body of george c. scott. it wasn t attic laterally adroit plan because when he went to the gun store to buy bullets to have ammunition for his gun, he was told, you cannot buy bullets for your gun. after two weeks in knock, chapman flies back to hawaii. he reveals to his wife he s