wheree energy wise which is the lifeblood of the o economy of everybody that western europe has an option beyond russia in case he goes nuts and wants to turn off the spigot from there. take syria, there are the russians and the iranians and like it or not the syrians they won the civil war.i they helped us to a degree kill isis in rocca and it syria, and of the united states wants to work with the russians, probably one of the worst civil war since the spanish civil war in the 30s.s il commend the president for trying to deal with it. sean: there s been one narrative but there is a far more evidence of y real collusi, the dnc paid operatives passing on information, meeting with the ukrainian ambassador at the embassy, then you ve got gps,
energy-wise, which is the lifeblood of the economy of everybody, that western europe has an option beyond russia. that s in case he goes nuts and wants to turn off the spigot from there. you know, take syria, sean. i mean, there the russians and ukrainians, like it or not, the syrians, won the civil war. hemmed us to a degree kill isis in raqqa and syria, and they want to affect the peace which will stop the horrific slaughter, in probably one of the worst civil wars since the spanish civil war of the 30s. this is a real world. i commend the president for trying to deal with it. there s been one narrative, but yet there s far more evidence of real collusion, the dnc paid operative, passing on information, meeting with the ukrainian ambassador at the embassy. then you ve got fusion gps,
types of things. then we have the syrian war. the three different isolated things. what i would hope to see from this administration is one, how do we solve self radicalizing here in the united states? how do we defeat isis in the middle east and how to become to some sort of resolution with the syrian war and take a sawed out? if those three things aren t there, i m against it. jesse: i don t think he wants to take a sought out in that speech. assad. it s not necessarily been effective. i thought he said let s just kill isis and squeeze those people and then we can maybe come to a political solution. richard: i don t think you can. the reason why isis is sprawling is because of assad. he s saying i m going to gas people and blow people up. the muslim community is saying if we are going to blow us up, we will join these people who are going to blow you up.
vehicle c very unpopulated area and we have pakistan involved now with helping isis get into afghanistan. so we ve got to deal with that frank. th flank. this is a weapon that can destroy a lot of people and material and a lot of people say, well, it s just 36 people that were killed. well, that s 36 that aren t planting ieds and aren t going to be fighting and killing green berets like we had killed the other day. we don t really know the true number. professor, to you, bigger picture on the use of this tremendous bomb sent to the rest of the world, i had an expert on yesterday saying that it sends a message to kim jong-un as we look ahead to this weekend in that country. do you think it sends a larger message? the president says it doesn t make any difference. do you think it does? just to step back a little
you have a commander in chief unleashing his commanders to make their decisions and find solutions to the problems on the ground as opposed to what we had in the past which was a tightly controlled command. commanders intent is to kill the enemy, kill isis and what you have here is a known trail between pakistan and afghanistan. this is in the same area that osama bin laden escaped, the same general region. nick and i operated in this area. this was his turf. he knows this ground. if nicholson says this is the right weapon for the right enemy at the right time, i believe him and trust him. i think it s a great thing that president trump has really unleashed our commanders to make these kinds of decisions. we ve got vince brooks in