comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Kiewit infrastructure west co - Page 8 : comparemela.com

Building Blocks: Raw Water Facilities • Daily Journal of Commerce

OWNER/DEVELOPER: Willamette Water Supply Program ENGINEER: Black & Veatch Corp. (Jeff McMullen) GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. TUNNELING SUBCONTRACTOR: James W. Fowler Co. SIGNIFICANCE OF PROJECT: The Willamette Water Supply System Commission’s goal is to provide a stable and seismically resilient water supply for ratepayers in Washington County. The cities of Hillsboro and Beaverton, along with the Tualatin Valley Water District, have come together to build more than 30 miles of large-diameter pipelines, expand the existing raw water facility, and modify an intake on the Willamette River near Wilsonville, a new raw water filtration facility near Sherwood and water reservoirs on Cooper Mountain.

Seattle DJC.com local business news and data - Construction - Sound Transit's maintenance facility cost could hit $2.8B

Photo from Sound Transit [enlarge] Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. is building the $3.1 billion Federal Way Link Extension, which will eventually connect to OMF South. Sound Transit has released the draft environmental impact statement for its south end operations and maintenance facility (OMF) and the price could top $2.8 billion, depending on which of three alternatives are picked. The document also details how each alternative would be built. The OMF is where light rail trains go for cleaning, storage and maintenance. Sound Transit operates one in the Sodo area of Seattle, is building a second OMF in Bellevue, and has plans for one north of Seattle in addition to this one in the south end. All four OMFs would operate around the clock. OMF South would service about 144 light rail vehicles.

Government Contracts Disputes In Focus: Claims Cases And Trends From The Second Half Of 2020 - Government, Public Sector

Inc., 13 the ASBCA rejected the contractor s attempt to escape default arising from the contractor s admitted nonperformance after the government exercised its offset right. No dispute existed that the government had terminated the contract because the contractor failed to deliver the specified equipment by the contractually required delivery date. The contractor nevertheless argued unsuccessfully that the government should have excused the nonperformance of its subcontractor due to lack of payment because the government had withheld payments to the prime contractor based on problems the prime had experienced on a separate contract effectively exercising its offset right. The board held that the default

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.