pipeline, the ability to move all of that oil down through the middle of the country. republicans have been calling for this. they say it s big for jobs. a report from the state department says there s no real impact on the climate. is this thing ready to be green lighted by the president? what would hold him back from saying the pipeline should go forward? he laid out his view on this last summer. if this is to go forward, it should not exacerbate the climate crisis in this country. didn t the state department say it won t? the friday report is the an important input into the process. we ll hear from other cabinet secretaries. think about this for a second. this year for the last three months of last year, october, november, december, we produced more oil than we imported for the first time. you didn t answer myquette. another thing. this morning in the new york times, terrible drought in the west including california as a result of climate change. we re going to resolve t
result of climate change. we re going to resolve the keystone question, but that s one in a much bigger issue. but i m focused on it so indulge me. what would stop him from saying yes at this point given his own state department saying there s not a big impact on the climate from doing this? he s been very clear he s going to insulate this process from politics. washington loves politics. you got a state department study. we have one department with a study. now we have other expert agencies. the epa and many others, the energy department, who had an opportunity to look at this and make their determination. the president wants make this decision based on the most sound science. where is the sweet spot on immigration? do you think you have a deal that can provide a pathway to legal status, and if it falls short of citizenship, could the president live with that. the president s principles on immigration have been out there for some time. the bottom line, he does not want to
indianapolis colts the last time peyton manning won a super bowl. welcome to you both. i m very glad to have you here. nice to be here, david, thank you. i want to make a disclosure before we start our discussion. my wife beth is an attorney that represents the nfl. she was part of the legal team that negotiated this agreement between the nfl and the players over concussions. so with that out of the way, let me talk about that settlement. let me put it up on the screen, what it represents. it is a concussion settlement worth $765 million covering current retired players for conditions that develop over the next 65 years. alan, a lot of the commentary is this was a great deal for the nfl and now it risks being unraveled by the judge who may conclude there s simply not enough money here to pay for all the damage that s been done. well, it s a question really of, is it enough morally? should these men be given more money because of the injuries they sustained?
from the governor s office or other individuals we subpoenaed. we don t know what this will lead us to. nothing yet implicates the governor. not directly. we ll be keeping up with this. thank you for your time. david, thank you. up next here with everybody talking about football, on then super bowl sunday, i ve got a different question. what is the future of the game given the concerns about concussions and player safety? we re going to discuss it next with nfl legend tony dungy and the reporter who has been covering the issue from the very start. that s coming up next. this is for you. [ male announcer ] bob s heart attack didn t come with a warning. today his doctor has him on a bayer aspirin regimen to help reduce the risk of another one. if you ve had a heart attack, be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.