senate because harry reid will still thereby to be an obstructionist. the first one will be the keystone pipeline which will get democratic support. it will be a big bipartisan jobs and infrastructure bill and the first thing the president will have to do is veto that bill which will put him in an awkward place politically. heather: the latest fox news poll shows 58% of people believe keystone should be built. what will the president do? i don t know what the president will do. there is no legislation yet. if it gets passed, what the final version will look like, this sets up the opportunity and frankly the threat for republicans. this notion of bringing it on really depend on what it is.
shale resources. he worked on president clinton s climate change task force. that s not a position that the person who aligns themselves with the democratic party would naturally assumes change. from economic perspective and geopolitical perspective developing natural gas makes sense. i don t understand environmentalists wanting gas. it is in favor of the keystone pipeline which would bring more oil to u.s. refineries to canada. they may have to wait until the mid term election but i think the likelihood is administration approves keystone or straight economic reasons. 4qi politics always factor i these decisions and they will in this decision, too. republicans democrats both do t it the technology in the oil
resources. reporter: democrat paul bledsoe worked on the climate change task force. that is not a person who aligns themselves with the democratic party would naturally be assumed to take. actually it turns out from a climate change perspective, an economic perspective, and a geo-political perspective, developing natural gas makes sense. so i don t really understand these environmentalists who are get making natural gas, i don t understand that. bledsoe is in favor of making access to the keystone pipeline which would bring more oil refineries from canada. they may have to wait until mid-term to get the base out. i think it is likely the administration approves keystone for economic reason. you don t expect we ll see, politics play a factor, republicans and democrats both do it. we re being held up with what
bledsoe worked on the climate change task force. that s not a position that a person who aligns themselves with the democratic party would naturally be assumed to take. actually it turns out from a climate change perspective, an economic perspective, and a geo-political perspective, developing natural gas makes sense. so i don t really understand these environmentalists who are against natural gas. it doesn t make any sense to me. bledsoe is in favor of making access to the keystone pipeline which would bring more oil refineries from canada. they may have to wait until mid-term to get the base out. i think it is likely the administration approves keystone for straight economic reasons. you don t expect a decision until after the midterm election? we ll see, politics play a factor, republicans and democrats both do it. we re being held up with what we can do as a nation, the technology in the oil and gas in the united states is the envy of
resources. reporter: democrat paul bledsoe worked on the climate change task force. that is not a person who aligns themselves with the democratic party would naturally be assumed to take. actually it turns out from a climate change perspective, an economic perspective, and a geo-political perspective, developing natural gas makes sense. so i don t really understand these environmentalists who are get making natural gas, i don t understand that. bledsoe is in favor of making access to the keystone pipeline which would bring more oil refineries from canada. they may have to wait until mid-term to get the base out. i think it is likely the administration approves keystone for economic reason. you don t expect we ll see, politics play a factor, republicans and democrats both do it. we re being held up with what we can do as a nation, the