reporting that the court mistakenly posted its opinion yesterday on a major abortion case in idaho based that s right. that was really a shock development yesterday. and actually the high court did confirm that a document was inadvertently posted to the court s website, and this was reviewed by bloomberg news and this was involving the case about abortions and idaho. and according to that document that was uploaded and we should caution this could change depending on what officially comes down from the high corporate and this was a 6-3 opinion you had three conservatives siding with three liberals and it essentially allows for abortions to happen in the state of idaho. in the case of medical emergency these not just when a woman s life is at risk. and so that is what the idaho abortion ban initially allowed for was just when a woman s life was at risk of doctor could perform that abortion. so that law is essentially on hold for now. and just to put this in perspective, when
On April 1, 2021, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Facebook v. Duguid, resolving a long-standing circuit split on the definition of an automatic telephone.
this this case it is a spending cyclele and we need people to save but we need them earning enough to spend and save and that is really the american way and i think it looks like we turned that corner back around towards that. shannon: great to see you today. thanks for spending part of your sunday with us. thanks for having me, shannon. shannon: a heart wrenching story about one little boy s fight with cancer. find out how his letters to god are inspiring millions of americans. story is coming up. and john paul stevens announced it is official. he is leaving the high court. we will take a look back at some of his decisions in key rulings, up next.