sfref gist. cleaver. jeffries. cline. kevin mccarthy. mccarthy. cloud. jim jordan. jordan. clyburn. hakeem jeffries. jeffries. clyde. andy biggs. biggs. cohen. i have eight times passed my vote for the greatest speaker of a generation, nancy pelosi. i proudly cast my vote for the next great speaker of the house of representatives, hakeem jeffries. jeffries. cole. kevin mccarthy. mccarthy. collins. mccarthy. mccarthy. komer. comer. mccarthy. mccarthy. connelly. hakeem jeffries of new york. jeffries. costa? the gentleman from new york, hakeem jeffries. jeffries. courtney. hakeem jeffries. jeffries. craig. hakeem jeffries. jeffries. crane. biggs. biggs. crawford? mccarthy. mccarthy. crenshaw. senator mccarthy. mccarthy. crockett. my first and very unified for hakeem jeffries. jeffries. crow. hakeem jeffries. jeffries. cuellar. jeffries. jeffries. curtis. kevin mccarthy. mccarthy. da
Before. Now, according to screenshots made available to the a. P. , gibson and her husband have been filming and posting their sex can a paid online for cash. More shocking her reaction to this story. She told the Washington Post that this revelation is illegal invasion of my privacy and designed to humiliate me and my family. Sweetheart, i think you did a pretty good job of that yourself. How is this an invasion of privacy when the post is reporting that gibson is said to have posted more than a dozen videos in september 2022, which is after she officially entered the race she now turned defiant. It wont intimidate me and silence me. There is no line political opponents wont cross to silence women when they speak up. What . Who is trying to silence her . She is the one who originally put the videos online for profit. Yet, we are now supposed to be offended by republicans who are talking about it . Yeah, okay. Gibson called the exposure of the videos the worst gutter politics. Hot kett
Before. Now, according to screenshots made available to the a. P. , gibson and her husband have been filming and posting their sex can a paid online for cash. More shocking her reaction to this story. She told the Washington Post that this revelation is illegal invasion of my privacy and designed to humiliate me and my family. Sweetheart, i think you did a pretty good job of that yourself. How is this an invasion of privacy when the post is reporting that gibson is said to have posted more than a dozen videos in september 2022, which is after she officially entered the race she now turned defiant. It wont intimidate me and silence me. There is no line political opponents wont cross to silence women when they speak up. What . Who is trying to silence her . She is the one who originally put the videos online for profit. Yet, we are now supposed to be offended by republicans who are talking about it . Yeah, okay. Gibson called the exposure of the videos the worst gutter politics. Hot kett
successor and happened when mccarthy was going to be the house republican leader and gave bad interviews and lost all support but this was before the vote there was a scrambling to get paul ryan who was the chairman of the budget committee to become speaker. this is not the situation here. he brought it to the floor of the house. yeah, he dropped out then and said he won t do that now. two thing that is stood out, the cs. eli crane and michael cloud who voted no. eli crane had ads from the fund, like a million dollars, that s kevin mccarthy decision there and he to go out and vote no is notable though there had been rumblings he was going to. cloud, he had not been on someone s radar voting no but what it suggests to me and i was on the hill this morning talking to mike lawler and brian fitzpatrick two mccarthy voters said they believe that the faction of the hard-liners are saving some no votes so if they do multiple ballots today the no votes against kevin mccarthy will only contin
people would maybe have not soon it when again, these are up proven allegations. the appropriate way to happen tell this is to explain as fred said that everyone was waylaid by the decision including the house house republican caucus. as reporters we do not exactly know how the kevin mccarthy decision came together. putting this rumor in context as one possible motivation among others, is the appropriate and responsible way to do it. deliberately ignoring something, whether it is true, matters and probably had some sort of impact. the inboxes from the powerful republican donor from chicago. fred? i think when it is a question of character with the leader of the republican party, you are compelled to report it even if there is no real evidence because everyone is reading it. in this day and age when everything is a public record, almost instantly, you have to