assuming he is not indicted, which i still think it s quite unlikely we will never see the affidavit. david: extraordinaire thing is we know in the past, particularly in the russian collusion kerfuffle we know in fact the fbi was giving that information if not outright lies to the judges that approved of the pfizer warrants. and a one person in particular, kevin kleinsmith was a justice department attorney pled guilty to giving misinformation on the crossfire hurricane investigation. so we know it has happened in the past. there is an old phrase trust but verify. that s a particular important now with the fbi is it not? it is correct. one thing to underscore contrary to what you hear, there fact to the judge approved it and is not prepared to his objectivity. does not establish anything the judge or magistrate has no
counterintelligence, he authored a handwritten note about his plan to entrap flynn. what is our goal, he wrote. truth, submission or get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired. we all know then what happened next. according to a partisan fbi agent name peter strzok, he s not the most impartial of sources, flynn told agent he wasn t sure if he talked about sanctions with the russian ambassador. that s it. now keep in mind talking about sanctions with a foreign country is legal and expected when you are the national security advisor. but for that, the fbi ruined michael flynn. he had to sell his home and where is bill priestap? collecting a government pension. no raid, no jail. the same is true for kevin kleinsmith. remember him? he s the fbi lawyer who falsified a fisa warrant application to secure the wiretap on flynn. he admitted it.
who lied, kevin kleinsmith on a fisa application against the 5%. and so they have been heavily involved in a very important security undermined when people lie directly in that process and you he got he got he got prosecuted. he was convicted of a felony. but frankly, i think they should throw the book at them and he should have gotten jail time. meantime, the sting in the swamp literally supreme court martials reportedly asking clerks coolly the role the i thought to myself,that s o long? it s really interesting. the marshal has been appointed by the supreme court justice, chief justice john roberts to investigate the issue. chambers within the supreme court operate in it of itself. each justice runs her own chambers even though they get hr and they worked technically for the whole court. very jealous of their relationship they have with their losses and is unusual to
you got james baker who had no notes and inconsistent memory? i wonder what next steps really look like at this point? reporter: the over all durham investigation began in 2019. john durham, at the time, he was u.s. attorney in connecticut. he resigned a year later. he s been investigating the origins of this entire trump russian narrative, where did it start and who started it. we know it turned out to be false the narrative. in 2020, john durham charged an fbi attorney by the name of kevin kleinsmith for altering a fisa warrant to be able to do surveillance on a trump campaign. a carter paige. kevin kleinsmith bleeded guilty to pleaded guilty. this was the first trial, harris, in three years of the