comfortable with that in certain kinds of situations. let s expand that kind of high-quality verified process to other people. it is another really interesting idea. thanks, kevin, for joining us. thank you. tomorrow in our sears we the washington monthly, on the future of success, too important to fail. can president obama s protection bureau put america s big banks in check? coming up next, why even conservatives like me are coming around to hillary clinton, at least according to steve. steve speaks so listen up. we know a place where tossing and turning have given way to sleeping. where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep. and lunesta can help you get there, like it has for so many people before. when taking lunesta, don t drive or operate machinery until you feel fully awake. walking, eating, driving, or engaging in other activities while asleep, without remembering it the next day,
they have to retain, upscale, they need to go back and get an education but college is really, really expensive these days as we all know. getting more expensive recall the time. and somebody who is working with children in a job they can t go move into a dorm for four years and go to colle like the traditional person. at the same time, they probably learned a lot during their career. rather than having them start from scratch and earn all those credits in a college class, what i m saying is we ought to give them credit for the legitimate skills that they have so they only have to focus on learning what they need to learn to get that degree that will give them a good job. kevin, i was wondering if you could be get into a bit more of the specifics of that. so what sorts of things are you thinking that people would have that they would be able to get credit for and would it be, are you envisioning sort of a testing system or how would they go about actually earning credits for that?
foreign correspondent eamon mohyeldin and mike viqueira at the white house. ayman, you say today s attack is tactically significant. tactically, you ve taken out the deputy minister of defense, the defense minister and a senior military officer all within the command and control structure of the military at the tip and spear of these. 0 rations to suppress the uprising. have you disrupted that to the extent that the military can not trust of who is among its midst. how did they penetrate the inner circle of the regime to carry out such a lethal explosion. even if they cannot meet to discuss out who carry out operations you get the sense of the kind of paranoia that can infiltrate the inner circles of the regime. from a psychological point of view that somebody was able to go deep into the heart of the regime with little collateral daniel no doubt is going to raise the anxiety levels because president assad, the question is how can he even meet with his senior officials if t
likely point to iran, but there has to be clear evidence nonetheless, regardless, it will only raise the level of anxiety in this part of the world that much more. the tension between these two countries has been mounting for the last several months. if indeed this is proven to be an iranian attack and if it is proven to be one with direct relations to the iranian government, there s no doubt that it is going to raise those stakes that much more. let me go to you, vick. there s been talk throughout the arab spring really about al qaeda infiltrating these rebel groups, including in syria. and it s not surprising. al qaeda has a history of exploiting these opportunities of chaos to come in and sort of infiltrate these vulnerable groups. i m wondering if you have any insight as to why the obama administration, why the united states seems to think that that s a good reason not to intervene supposed to a good reason to intervene. probably because there s a lot more to it than
about the president s state of the union speech. and at 9:15, a discussion on mexico s druck drug traffickers. . no carrierringconnect c1 from watching the exchange yesterday and seeing what the president had to say and how republicans responded, we want to get your sense of what you learned about policy, decision making, the relationship between the president and the republicans on capitol hill. to give you a flavor of the exchanges yesterday, many of the dove with health care, is somewhat the president had to say. if you were to listen to the debate and frankly you get to this bill, you would think that this thing was some bolshevik plot. [applause] that is that you guys presented. i was thinking to myself, how was it that it planned how is it that a plan that is pre centrist that is pretty centrist i am just saying and i know you guys disagree, if you look at the facts of this bill, most independent observers would say that this is what many republicans is simi