That since they moved in, they have significantly landscaped their backyard with trees and tall shrubs on all property boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me building project. This proposal, or the permitte
From the yard was taken from the upstairs of our building and that the closest idea that we have right now. We know that other neighbors have thought about it and our property when they remodeled and we have not seen as much of that right here, a lot was promised and the story poles and anything else that would allowed them to understand how this project will effect us in the neighborhood. We have tried to follow it as best as we can and we feel misled and in the dark, i ask the on behalf of the home owners in the building that this project not proceed in the current form. Thank you. Next speaker. Good evening, commissioners, my name is katherine rostrum and i am here to speak in support of the project. And i first met andrea, 25 years ago as my childrens pediatrician and i became friends of the family. From my long experience years of experience they are wonderful friends and Community Members with a focus of service and helping others and she has always been there for my children and
Investment in the project. This is within the guidelines and no variances and it is code compliant and it will allow the family to stay in the city, and improve basic Housing Stock in san francisco. I urge you to support the Planning Commissions decision. Thank you. Thank you. Is there any other Public Comment . Okay, seeing none, then we will have rebuttal starting with miss smith and you have three minutes. Okay. Smith if you could wait one minute, we are going to take a pause. Oneminute break. One minute. My lot is 125 feet deep and not 9 deep feet as are the miller and so i really dont extend into the open space. More than the laytons do. And because my lot is much longer. And as far as the fence went, and when we all have fences in san francisco. And if we didnt have a fence, everybody in the neighborhood would have my dogs running through their yards which i am sure that they would not appreciate. And the reason the layton house is much smaller than mine is because they have a pe
We know that other neighbors have thought about it and our property when they remodeled and we have not seen as much of that right here, a lot was promised and the story poles and anything else that would allowed them to understand how this project will effect us in the neighborhood. We have tried to follow it as best as we can and we feel misled and in the dark, i ask the on behalf of the home owners in the building that this project not proceed in the current form. Thank you. Next speaker. Good evening, commissioners, my name is katherine rostrum and i am here to speak in support of the project. And i first met andrea, 25 years ago as my childrens pediatrician and i became friends of the family. From my long experience years of experience they are wonderful friends and Community Members with a focus of service and helping others and she has always been there for my children and other. Children and the that she knows, and waiting through the night and waiting for the several times in
Living space. They have failed to mention that since they moved in, they have significantly landscaped their backyard with trees and tall shrubs on all property boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me buildi