Planning department and that i think we already stated kind of our analysis and our concerns related to section, 317 on the planning code and the department knows that this is properly before the board for your decision and you are trying to resolve this in a matter that is trying to resolve and address the concerns in the safe and ha bitable building and but i will, let me raise two points because that has also been made as part of the wish list and i am not supportive of getting rid of the set back on the third floor. I think that that is a standard of the bench of the design lines and it reduce its from the street and i would like to keep that. And the other thing is that there are no light wells shown on the existing floor plans for the two adjacent buildings below the third floor. But, i am confused because one building is only two stories. I think that was correct and there is a discrepancy on the plans, and the floor plans do not show what if any light wells exist on the adjacen
How long. No. Not long, so we will take the next available hearing. What is good for you . There is nothing good. It is really up to the board if you want to add to your load. How many do we have on the tenth. You have ten new appeals on the tenth and you have eleven matters on the 17th. And some of those may leave between now and then and i some of them will take long. Two weeks. Yeah. Two weeks. It is december 10th is that what you are suggesting. And december the tenth, is longer than ten weeks, and the next is on december the tenth. And mr. Duffy is saying that the 17th would work better for him. Okay. And i am sorry commissioners, it is a lot is going on right now, if i could make one more point of clarification, i am hearing from the architect right now, that taking a light well all the way down to the ground could have the structural. I did not say ground floor, i said to match all existing light wells on the side. Does it go down. And so apparently what i am hearing is that the
317 on the planning code and the department knows that this is properly before the board for your decision and you are trying to resolve this in a matter that is trying to resolve and address the concerns in the safe and ha bitable building and but i will, let me raise two points because that has also been made as part of the wish list and i am not supportive of getting rid of the set back on the third floor. I think that that is a standard of the bench of the design lines and it reduce its from the street and i would like to keep that. And the other thing is that there are no light wells shown on the existing floor plans for the two adjacent buildings below the third floor. But, i am confused because one building is only two stories. I think that was correct and there is a discrepancy on the plans, and the floor plans do not show what if any light wells exist on the adjacent building and i think that one of the issues that we had in reviewing this, since keeping the walls would the bo
Planning department and that i think we already stated kind of our analysis and our concerns related to section, 317 on the planning code and the department knows that this is properly before the board for your decision and you are trying to resolve this in a matter that is trying to resolve and address the concerns in the safe and ha bitable building and but i will, let me raise two points because that has also been made as part of the wish list and i am not supportive of getting rid of the set back on the third floor. I think that that is a standard of the bench of the design lines and it reduce its from the street and i would like to keep that. And the other thing is that there are no light wells shown on the existing floor plans for the two adjacent buildings below the third floor. But, i am confused because one building is only two stories. I think that was correct and there is a discrepancy on the plans, and the floor plans do not show what if any light wells exist on the adjacen
From the yard was taken from the upstairs of our building and that the closest idea that we have right now. We know that other neighbors have thought about it and our property when they remodeled and we have not seen as much of that right here, a lot was promised and the story poles and anything else that would allowed them to understand how this project will effect us in the neighborhood. We have tried to follow it as best as we can and we feel misled and in the dark, i ask the on behalf of the home owners in the building that this project not proceed in the current form. Thank you. Next speaker. Good evening, commissioners, my name is katherine rostrum and i am here to speak in support of the project. And i first met andrea, 25 years ago as my childrens pediatrician and i became friends of the family. From my long experience years of experience they are wonderful friends and Community Members with a focus of service and helping others and she has always been there for my children and