we begin this hour with waco, texas, the fight of donald trump s first official rally of the presidential campaign. overshadowing the possibility of criminal indictment. coming from separate investigations in manhattan. in georgia and in washington d.c.. now it is no surprise that trump continues to pacey triples investigations through nothing more than political reporting for nbc news jonathan allen writes, quote, trump s [inaudible] government run conspiracies launched with power and freedom. he s been really against government officials investigating him, with an increasingly dark warning about will happen if he is charged. trump s attacking the investigation continuing even after, even after nbc or someone sent death threats to the manhattan district attorney alvin bragg. he s investigating alleged flush stormy daniels 2016 election. [inaudible] discussed trump s social media post attacking brag with reverend al sharpton. [inaudible] he posted it. answer the que
He needs to be stopped : Mother shocked at son s track of forgeries and unpaid debts
stuff.co.nz - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from stuff.co.nz Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
but either way we know that eventually at some point the wisconsin supreme court will decide on the case about the constitutionality of the 1849 abortion ban. and then what does that mean for people in wisconsin? sure. if it is decided that it is competition, it will mean on the books. janet has been pretty clear that she believes it is unconstitutional. and we ll decide against it. in that case there also maybe some options. if the court decides to redraw the maps, that is the more indirect way in which abortion could be supported or not supported in wisconsin. specifically there was an act introduced that abortion rights in about 2017 by kelvin lloyd. we can see that it didn t go anywhere, obviously, given the composition of our legislature. but if the court decides that the maps that are there, pretty
and we ll decide against it. in that case there also maybe some options. if the court decides to redraw the maps, that is the more indirect way in which abortion could be supported or not supported in wisconsin. specifically there was an act introduced that abortion rights in about 2017 by kelvin lloyd. we can see that it didn t go anywhere, obviously, given the composition of our legislature. but if the court decides that the maps that are there, pretty widely agreed they are gerrymander. they are redrawn, rather, that it could have important implications for the composition of the legislature and the ability to make decisions about whether abortion is illegal or not. wisconsin is one of about a dozen states that banned abortions in after the dobbs decision. some of the studies and impacts of the time, what has it meant for your state? i want to make something pretty clear to the viewers.