aviation is propelling changes on what passengers can take into the aircraft. terror groups are obsessed with blowing up commercial passenger planes, preferably a u.s. carrier bound for the united states. are you going to ban laptops from the cabin on all int international flights both into and out of the u.s.? i might. kelly first told cnn why he thinks expanding the laptop ban is necessary. you ve hinted this ban could even happen right here on u.s. soil. is that true or did they misread you? they didn t misread me. the threats against passenger aviation world wide are constant. a u.s. based ban would restrict electronics larger than a cell phone in the cabin, those includes ipads, e readers and
restrictions and new screening measures are on the way. he s less clear on when those would happen. despite the dire warnings from secretary kelly. deliberations on the expansion of this ban has spread several weeks. the lengthy deliberation is due to kelly s desire to consider the full impact of this ban. it drives 1$1.5 trillion in economic activity in the united states looking at how this ban could impact that as well as another source saying they are looking at the science behind this whole thing. you could tell from his body language how worried the secretary of homeland security john kelly is worried right now. finally tonight, some good news, our situation room family continues to grow, our congressional correspondent and her husband alexis, they ve
various payments were made by wealthy supporters to protect protect his presidential ambitions. edwards faces a slew of charges, including conspiracy. he claims the money in question was a gift not a campaign contribution. there s no question that i ve done wrong. and i take full responsibility. for having done wrong. and i will regret for the rest of my life, the pain and the harm that i ve caused others. but i did not break the law. and i never, ever thought i was breaking the law. thank you all very much. sean: joining me with reaction, tamara holder and former prosecutor, kelly it doesn t matter if he thinks whether he broke the law or not. the question is, he an obligation to know. if i get caught speeding, i didn t see the limit. that is not going to matter. should he have been indicted?
using her, all the while cheating on her of the lying about the child s paternity. lying about the affair. he s a scumbag. we know. he should go to jail for being a bag. not break the law. what law did he break? also, sean [ talking over each other ] sean: hang on! slow down. kelly first, go ahead. okay. in the campaign to ask what law he broke it takes it clear to me and no disrespect, you obviously haven t read the indictment, which i did it is 19 pages. i have. then you know what law they are claiming he broke. if you read it, it is in there. sean: tamara. i read the indictment, it is not talking about the fact that he an affair. the indictment is very clear. it is very clear what laws they are saying he broke. yes, it is sean. if you read it, it is in there. okay.
that that he diverted funds. that he asked people who work for him to be complicit in these crimes. he knew and he should face the consequences. why did he lie? sean: kelly, i feel sorry for this guy s children. i don t feel sorry for him. they lost their mother. the father guess to jail, now they lose their father. he faces 30 years in jail on this. in that sense, think the court or a jury will tend to want to show leniency under the circumstances? he s never going to be president. what do you any? i don t think he s going to serve close to 30 years. i think this case will never see the light of day at trial. he has so much to lose. and there is so much dirty landry. but, my understanding is, he s been trying to negotiate a jail without jail time and the feds are digging in. he s a public figure and they are going to make an example. even if he cuts a deal he s