yes, you may. let me he show you state s 165, ask you if you recognize that. yes. how do you recognize 165. with the case number, exhibit number and my admonishes. what is contained in that exhibit. there is one fired jacket portion, two fired bullet jackets fragments and one le lead core. when you receive parts of a bullet or fragments of a bullet in a firearm are you able to compare those to determine whether or not those fragments were fired from a particular firearm. yes. explain to the jury how you do that. similar to the cartridge cases i ll use the bullet that i ve test-fired from the submitted firearm, and compare those microscopically to the submitted evidence bullet or bullet fragments. and did you do that with the fragments in this case in the kel tech pistol. i did. what did you find.
and how do you recognize that? that case number, exhibit number and my initials. what do you recognize it to be. it is one fired .9mm lugar caliber cartridge case. when you receive a firearm and a tpaoeurpld casing are yo fired indicating are you able to determine whether that particular casing came from that particular firearm? remember. how can you do that? with a submitted firearm and magazine, i will use laboratory and/or evidence ammunition to test fire that pistol. i will then collect the fired cartridge cases and compare those microscopically to the evidence cartridge cases that i received. did you do that with the shell casing or cartridge case in this case, and also the kel tech pistol. yes. what did you find. the cartridge case was fired from the pistol. did you receive some bullet fragments in this case. yes i did. may i approach the witness?
that is a close-up of the distance test that i had made, the arrows are pointing to diagonal tear that occurred in the fabric. when you conducted the distance test with the kel-tech pistol and the hooded sweatshirt, what did you determine about the distance between the muzzle of the gun and the material at the time the gun was discharged? the clothing displayed residues and physical effects consistent with a contact shot. meaning the muzzle, or the end of the barrel of the gun was up against the sweatshirt when it was fired? correct. all right. let s go to state s 127. what is that? this is the other sweatshirt that i had received to do distance determination on. again, you made measurements of where the hole is relative on the sweatshirt?