found. and, in fact, they have found that baseline costs of adding harvey milk s name to the airport can be as little as 355,000. that many of the costs that are attributed to this effort are costs that would not be incurred by the airport, but, in fact, would be incurred by other government agencies like caltrans. unfortunately, in providing an estimate of how much caltrans would actually end up spending in this effort, should they be asked to change some of the signs that are involved, it was reported to the budget and legislative analyst that the airport, in fact, did not bother to ask caltrans for their perspective or their opinion on that matter. and, so, the cost of the estimate that is related to caltrans was as a result overestimated by $2.5 million or nearly 350% of the actual cost. the cost of changing highway signs, according to caltrans you ll hear it from the horse s mouth would only be $20,000 per sign, which is actually six times lower than the $120,000 per
now, the renaming in no way takes away from [speaker not understood] s achievements. we recognize he is an important figure globally and that he has done much as a laboringer and a political leader. however, his recent comments has not represented the city that i m part of. the city is a refuge for many members of our lgbt community and we didn t feel it was appropriate to continue to have his name on one of our streets. but a little bit on tom odell. dr. tom odell was adopted by his neighbors, jean and hazel after moving in with them at the age of 15 following his parents separation. growing up in new jersey he was encouraged by his adoptive parents to pursue gymnastics and discovered that he exceled in athletics. he continued his gymnastics career while attending springfield college in massachusetts, and changed his mainly before switching to premed. after graduating he attended medical school in the new jersey college of medicine where he put his degree to use as a preven
that we are introducing is one that recognizes that we need strike a balance between the right to free speech and the right of women, especially to access health care. no right is absolute. and the courts have found that buffer zones like the one that san francisco that we are introducing today, in fact are narrowly tailored and survive legal scrutiny. the narrow scope of this ordinance ensures that the facilities we re talking about, and we are talking about freestanding health clinics which are the most vulnerable when it comes to being targets of this kind of activity, that those facilities are indeed protected. i want to talk a little bit about what the law in this area is. the right to free speech is not absolute. the effort to regulate this kind of speech is something that has to be done carefully. it has to be done in a way that is narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest. we believe that we are doing that precisely here. the analysis of what is